bush leadership failures: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/14/AR2009011402791_pf.html
Nope, nobody. Joe Six-Pack doesn't care, as long as he has his 6 pack and 500 channels and free porn on the 'net.
Agenda setting is more difficult than most realize. Funny that Bush had it in the beginning, but now it's considered leprotic.
I didn't think there was anyone left who would defend this moron we've had for 8 years, except for maybe Barney.
At least, the socialist dictator hasn't killed four thousand United States soldiers in Iraq FOR NOTHING. And.....bankrupted the country.
No, but the party associated with that dictator allowed for millions of people to go into foreclosure, because Bill Clinton felt they were entitled to receive mortgages that they were never qualified for to begin with. The Democratic party had totally ruined this country!!! It was their douche bag thinking by having an affirmative action lending policy that had led the the U.S.A. going bankrupt. They are the biggest pussies when it comes to national defense, and their economic policies are absolute disasters. Tax, tax, tax, give out more welfare, take away all free enterprise opportunities, and give that guy who makes $8.00 an hour, and who has a 500 fico score, a $300,000.00 mortgage. As for our troops going to Iraq, we were going to have to do it sooner or later. Saddam Hussien was a modern day Adolph Hitler, and I totally agree with the Bush decision to invade. Obviously, they had weapons of mass destruction, and had used them on their own people, plus, no one will ever be able to convince me that Saddam didn't have something to do with 9/11, because he and Al Qaeda were absolutely in bed together. Has the situation been handled properly Iraq? No it hasn't. I'll be the first to admit that Rumsfeld was totally wrong with his military strategy there. We needed overwhelming numbers of troops there to secure the country and maintain order. That obviously didn't happen. John McCain said from the very beginning that we needed 200,000 - 300,000 troops there from the start. Had we followed his lead, we would be out of Iraq much sooner, than later. And as far as our torturing prisoners, in my opinion, we haven't done enough of it!!!!!!!!! How quick people are to forget 9/11. We need to be on the offensive militarily, and just can't sit back and wait to be attacked again. Obama will have no clue how to defend America. I can see it now, on day one he'll close Gitmo, allow for every terror detainee there to go free, give them an automatic path to U.S. citizenship, provide them free health care, and a pension - "all tax free of course"!
The ignore feature is wonderful. But I feel for the people that have to live with some of you. After reading an especially mindless post, I can just delete it and you from my screen. On the other hand, people have to live thier lives close to some of you.
Ohhh...The mortgage mess was Bill Clinton's fault. Ohhh...It was Saddam Hussein who was the modern day Adolph Hitler. Ohhh...Saddam had something to do with 9/11. Ohhh...Saddam was associated with Al Qaeda. Hmmm...I want to thank you for straightening me out on all these issues. I have been misled for so many years. Guess I'm gonna have to get back in college and watch more Fox News. Are you sure the mortgage mess wasn't the fault of Eisenhower or Hoover or Abraham Lincoln or Buddy Holly? Just want to double check.
If you actually had a clue, you would know that it was the Clinton administration that pressured the banks in the 1990's to lower the standards so that everyone could be approved for a mortgage. He felt home ownership was a something that should just be handed to people, and not earned. Your such a dumb shit, so I'll leave you to debate with yourself, that is if your not jacking yourself off all over your New York Times. You probably wack your pathetic little pee pee watching Keith Olbermann on MSNBC with all the rest of the liberal douche bags. Bye bye loser!!!