The Flynn Entrapment

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Poindexter, Dec 13, 2018.

  1. elderado

    elderado

    Holy fucking cow.

    WHEN IS CHRISTOPHER WRAY GETTING FIRED???

     
    #61     Apr 24, 2020
  2. After the election. And Trump will let Barr pick his own person for FBI director.

    Meanwhile, thank you for your service to your country Mr. Barr.

    Roger Stone and Mannafort will be coming home after the election too. Not sure Stone has left yet. And a pardon for Popodoupolooulisoulis.

    Michael Cohen will probably be prosecuted for a couple more things. Little joke there- or not.
     
    #62     Apr 24, 2020
  3. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    After all your Horowitz and democrat primary predictions I'm glad you predict a Trump win in November
     
    #63     Apr 24, 2020
  4. RRY16

    RRY16

    Your wife appreciates your Lysol farts.
     
    #64     Apr 24, 2020
  5. Good1

    Good1

    Good point. When they suggested that if he wanted to bring lawyers that they might want to involve the DOJ, that's a red flag, and Flynn should have gone directly to Trump/Pence to see how they would like to see it handled. At the very least Flynn should have been recording the meeting preferably with Trump/Pence direction. Or he should have let them (Trump/Pence) decide how/why/when/where DOJ needed to be involved.

    In any case, i felt it was a mistake they let him go on trumped up charges...as if the reverse-intelligence dogs would be satisfied with a scrap of meat like that. As if they could avoid being scalped if they pretended to distance themselves from anyone being smeared red in the process of doing their job for passing within six feet of a Russian without a mask.

    Sessions saw this, and, having passed within six feet of a Russian without a mask in process of doing his job, he recused himself without first telling Trump/Pence, leaving Rosenstoned>Mooler>Weinstoned in charge of Trump's fate. Lo and behold, he was able to claw onto his weekly paycheck for what, two more years? Disloyal? Yes. But then, how loyal were Trump/Pence toward Flynn?, probably thought Sessions, as he wondered whether anyone had his back.
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2020
    #65     Apr 25, 2020
  6. Good1

    Good1

    I'd like to think so. And, post-election makes sense if impending indictments are politically charged enough to jeopardize re-election.

    But Dr. Jerome Corsi would disagree Barr is intending to distribute justice where ever a trail of corruption may lead. Believes Barr is experienced in covering things up, and is in process of covering up something of stupendous proportions. I'd like to agree...but only until the re-election.

    Corsi is currently interviewing a one "Boris", a kind of rain-man of intelligence analysis and spy of international spycraft. Perhaps the most astonishing of Boris' revelations is Putin's compromise of the U.S.A.'s own spy programs, having first compromised Clapper after Clapper had used spy programs to gather inside info for purposes of front-running stock market positions. Putin then used the spy programs for the same purpose, building up billions in short order, as well finding a basis to blackmail Obama. Having blackmailed Obama into compliance, Putin actually wished Obama to hold office for two more years, and worked with Obama and top intelligence officials to bring about indictments upon which ever candidate was elected, either Clinton or Trump, disqualifying either of them from taking an oath of office until an investigation might clear them for election in 2018. The plan had to be aborted when Boris started to intervene, letting them know how he had enough info to bust them all. It sounds like it all goes back to when Bush Jr. brought Putin out to his ranch in Texas and tried to blackmail Putin into some kind of compliance. What Bush told Putin made him suspect the U.S.A. had a deeper spy program than previously suspected, and, in retaliation, ordered his top people to find out more about it. They got a break when they found out Clapper was invested in a Soros fund, and was providing Soros with insider information to improve his investment. They then blackmailed passwords out of Clapper to US spy programs that they then used to get dirt on Obama.

    Is any of this believable? The way people act, it seems plausible to me. Just recently, Joe Biden has suggested Trump is going to try to delay the election. Hmm. What would Biden know about delaying elections? Why would he even think that is possible?
     
    #66     Apr 25, 2020
    Dr. Love likes this.
  7. elderado

    elderado

    #67     Apr 25, 2020
  8. Good1

    Good1

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-be-indicted-after-winning-election?_amp=true

    A small revelation in support of the Boris thesis outlined in my last post above...that either candidate was being prepped for a possible indictment AFTER the election...and that Obama actually put a thumb on the scale in favor of Trump, preferring to see him indicted. Any indictment was supposed to cause a constitutional crisis that would make Congress move to postpone the election two years...possibly nullifying the 2016 vote. The master plan involved blackmail of electors and congressmen. Seems like a lot of trouble for all involved (Putin et al) just to see two more years of Obama. Was he really that compromised that he himself would go along with this? So the Corsi>>Boris thesis needs a lot more support for me to take it too seriously. Any of this ring true for anybody?
     
    #68     Apr 26, 2020
  9. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

     
    #69     Apr 26, 2020
    Good1, TreeFrogTrader and jem like this.
  10. Thank you for your service to your country, General Barr.
     
    #70     Apr 26, 2020
    WeToddDid2 likes this.