The Flaw in Trading System Reasoning...?

Discussion in 'Strategy Building' started by Remiraz, Dec 14, 2004.

  1. Thanks for the hint.

    Do you have any preferences/ pointers to measure volatility? :confused:
     
    #71     Dec 25, 2004
  2. Yes....agreed. Although, unless you are first to make a trade, I believe all similar systems do not increase in value as more people use them. This is quite the opposite of the fax machine idealogy (the more users the more value the fax machine has, even as its price drops). So, perhaps, the less people that trade systems close to one's own, the more potential for profit. Thats just a theory. Something I believe in more strongly is that the more original one's system of trading is (the corollary being that less people will be trading it than a "less original" system) the less noise there is likely at the trading signals. This may or may not be true, the idea is difficult to test, its just something I think about in various forms from time to time.
     
    #72     Dec 25, 2004
  3. #73     Dec 26, 2004
  4. Thanks again for the input.

    Would you also find Wilder's Volatility Index and ADXR to be useful?

    Q
    The Directional Movement Index (Average Directional Movement Index Rating ADXR) is my answer to this problem.

    --- New concept in technical trading systems, Welles Wilder
    UQ
    :confused:
     
    #74     Dec 26, 2004
  5. Q
    Volatility is also an indicator of movement. The paradox is that volatility is always accompanied by movement, but movement is not always accompanied by volatility.

    A commodity can move up very slowly and be high on the Average Directional Movement Index Rating (ADRX) but still be low on the Volatility Index.
    UQ
    :confused:
     
    #75     Dec 26, 2004
  6. Talking about trend and ADX, the article here does not even mention anything about Volatility?

    http://www.forex.com/forex_trend_indicators.html

    Q
    The ADX is used to determine whether or not a market is trending (regardless if it's up or down), with a reading over 25 indicating a trending market and a reading below 20 indicating no trend. The ADX is also a measure of the strength of a trend--the higher the ADX, the stronger the trend. Using the ADX, traders can determine whether or not there is a trend and thus whether or not to use a trend following system.
    UQ
    :confused:
     
    #76     Dec 26, 2004
  7. Remiraz

    Remiraz

    One thing i noticed is that sometimes high volatility does not equate to directional movement.

    For example, days with long bars/candles that whipsaw up and down.
     
    #77     Dec 26, 2004
  8. Thanks for the good point.

    According to Wilder, "the most important index to use for a trend-following system is the ADXR; however, generally the most money is made in the shortest period of time when the stock or commodity is volatile."

    Actually, he also suggestd to use his Commodity Selection Index (CSI = ADXR x ATR x K; K represents all the constants) to take both ADXR (Directional?) and ATR (Volatility?) into consideration at the same time. :confused:
     
    #78     Dec 26, 2004
  9. It's posible that:

    for daytraders, volatility and its movements would be good and important to make profits;

    whereas, for longer term traders would be bad due to the additional risk. :confused:
     
    #79     Dec 27, 2004
  10. Remiraz

    Remiraz

    IMHO, crux of volatility studies in trading systems is how to differentiate bad whipsaw volatility from good directional volatility.

    Even daytraders have no use for whipsaw volatility.
    Maybe tick scalpers have.

    :confused:
     
    #80     Dec 27, 2004