The Fauci Emails

jem · Jun 4, 2021

notice our soviet minister may sense that the party will turn on Tony and he has to wait for Pravda to tell him what he can say.

gwb-trading · Jun 4, 2021

Tsing Tao said:
Your stances are biased on "facts".

Fixed it for ya.

There have been many instances where I've shown you a fact right to your face and you've maintained you weren't looking at it. Or what about the times you've outright made up blatant lies about what I have said or supported? Remember the whole 5G bullshit?

Yeah, your stances are based on facts alright.
More...

Once again -- this week you cited Jennifer/Len Cabrera of the "Rational Ground" blog as a source for COVID misinformation on this thread. The tweets and blog posts from "Rational Ground" have been one of your favorite sources over time. Should I simply go back and re-post all of their support for Hydroxychloroquine, 5G causing COVID, and promotion of the demon sperm doctor to show the typical integrity of the sources you use.

Tsing Tao · Jun 4, 2021

gwb-trading said:
Once again -- this week you cited Jennifer/Len Cabrera of the "Rational Ground" blog as a source for COVID misinformation on this thread. The tweets and blog posts from "Rational Ground" have been one of your favorite sources over time. Should I simply go back and re-post all of their support for Hydroxychloroquine, 5G causing COVID, and promotion of the demon sperm doctor to show the typical integrity of the sources you use.
More...

Once again, you fail a simple logic test.

Person A can say something that Person B supports. That does not mean Person B supports everything that Person A ever said in his or her life.

Here's a real world example. Ricter (just picking on him randomly) and I don't agree all the time. In fact, we don't agree all that much. But if he came out and said "GWB is a fucking idiot." I would wholeheartedly agree. Because he and I agree you are a fucking idiot doesn't mean I suddenly support all of Ricter's positions.

Sorry for dragging you into this, Ricter. I just needed an example, though I doubt even an example as clear as this is likely to be grasped by someone (GWB) who can't find coherency with two hands and a flashlight.

gwb-trading · Jun 4, 2021

Tsing Tao said:
Once again, you fail a simple logic test.

Person A can say something that Person B supports. That does not mean Person B supports everything that Person A ever said in his or her life.

Here's a real world example. Ricter (just picking on him randomly) and I don't agree all the time. In fact, we don't agree all that much. But if he came out and said "GWB is a fucking idiot." I would wholeheartedly agree. Because he and I agree you are a fucking idiot doesn't mean I suddenly support all of Ricter's positions.

Sorry for dragging you into this, Ricter. I just needed an example, though I doubt even an example as clear as this is likely to be grasped by someone (GWB) who can't find coherency with two hands and a flashlight.
More...

You really need to look into the concept of the integrity of your sources. And stop promoting fabricated bullshiat from blogs and social media -- much of which has been marked as "false information".

jem · Jun 4, 2021

I cite you too your posts and media sources and declaring the Covid apocalypse in Texas and Florida and Sweden... when they did not lock down a first or second time?

For that matter I cite you too your propagandist Tony Fauci...

gwb-trading said:
You really need to look into the concept of the integrity of your sources. And stop promoting fabricated bullshiat from blogs and social media -- much of which has been marked as "false information".
More...

CaptainObvious · Jun 4, 2021

TreeFrogTrader · Jun 4, 2021

jem · Jun 4, 2021

Tony Fauci is that asshole who said that asymptomatic spread is very rare in his emails and then chastises the who..... for saying the same thing...

even though there were no reports of statistically significant cases of aysmptomatic spread... (ever really)

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/10/dr-...matic-coronavirus-spread-was-not-correct.html

It was all bullshit... nay... fucking lies to further fascism.

Snarkhund · Jun 4, 2021

jem said:
Tony Fauci is that asshole who said that asymptomatic spread is very rare in his emails and then chastises the who..... for saying the same thing...

even though there was no new cases of asymptomatic spread...

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/10/dr-...matic-coronavirus-spread-was-not-correct.html

It was all bullshit... nay... fucking lies to further fascism.
More...

I understand what went on here.

Fauci has been SES for so long that I suspect that much of what he has said over the last year has mostly been pulled straight out of his ass.

Its called "the Grey Beard Effect". When you're at the top of the technocratic heap for a long time you begin to believe your own bullshit.

WeToddDid2 · Jun 4, 2021

Tsing Tao said:
Ah, so it is starting to come out. All the stuff we were told to "Trust The Experts™" on, and now we're beginning to see it was all made up and a political push - kinda like we said it was.

The following is an editorial:

Email: Researcher Who Funded Wuhan Lab, Admitted To Manipulating Coronaviruses Thanked Fauci For Dismissing Lab Leak Theory

Dr Fauci’s emails have been released via a Freedom of Information Act request, and there is some pretty interesting stuff in them, particularly one email where a researcher who funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology thanks Fauci for publicly dismissing the lab leak theory early on during the pandemic.

The email from Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance, a group that has extensive ties to the Wuhan lab gain of function research, sent the email to Fauci on April 18, 2020, roughly six weeks after the outbreak had taken hold.

The email states:

“As the Pl of the ROl grant publicly targeted by Fox News reporters at the Presidential press briefing last night, I just wanted to say a personal thank you on behalf of our staff and collaborators, for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

From my perspective, your comments are brave, and coming from your trusted voice, will help dispel the myths being spun around the virus’ origins. Once this pandemic’s over I look forward thanking you in person and let you know how important your comments are to us all.”

Fauci responded to the email the day after, writing

“Peter:

Many thanks for your kind note.

Best Regards,

Tony”

Daszak, who also works for the World Health Organisation, is on record admitting that he was involved with manipulating coronaviruses. Here is a video of him talking in DECEMBER 2019 about how ‘good’ the viruses are for messing around with in a lab:

11 Comments

Dr Fauci’s emails have been released via a Freedom of Information Act request, and there is some pretty interesting stuff in them, particularly one email where a researcher who funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology thanks Fauci for publicly dismissing the lab leak theory early on during the pandemic.

The email from Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance, a group that has extensive ties to the Wuhan lab gain of function research, sent the email to Fauci on April 18, 2020, roughly six weeks after the outbreak had taken hold.

The email states:

“As the Pl of the ROl grant publicly targeted by Fox News reporters at the Presidential press briefing last night, I just wanted to say a personal thank you on behalf of our staff and collaborators, for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

From my perspective, your comments are brave, and coming from your trusted voice, will help dispel the myths being spun around the virus’ origins. Once this pandemic’s over I look forward thanking you in person and let you know how important your comments are to us all.”

Fauci responded to the email the day after, writing

“Peter:

Many thanks for your kind note.

Best Regards,

Tony”

Daszak, who also works for the World Health Organisation, is on record admitting that he was involved with manipulating coronaviruses. Here is a video of him talking in DECEMBER 2019 about how ‘good’ the viruses are for messing around with in a lab:

Daszak notes that “coronaviruses are pretty good… you can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily… the spiked proteins drive a lot about what happens. You can get the sequence you can build the protein, we work with Ralph Baric at UNC to do this, insert into the backbone of another virus and do some work in a lab.”

Elsewhere, the emails show that Fauci also knew very early on, before the WHO even declared a pandemic, that researchers suspected the virus had been ‘potentially engineered’ in a lab, as this exchange with Kristian G. Andersen of the Scripps Research Institute from January 2020 shows:

The emails with Fauci show that Daszak had already dismissed the lab leak notion nearly a year before that ‘investigation’ began, and despite other researchers saying it looked potentially engineered.

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this is that Daszak was one of the lead “investigators” on the WHO panel tasked with looking into the origins of the pandemic.

Is it any surprise that this guy, whose organisation has shovelled at least $600,000 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the past few years to play around with coronaviruses inside the lab, determined within 3 hours of visiting the lab in February 2021 that there was ‘nothing to see here’?

Daszak, like Fauci, has also since denied that there was any gain of function research being conducted at the Wuhan lab, and that it wasn’t being funded by EcoHealth Alliance or via the NIH with US tax dollars.

These are blatant lies, as there is mountains of evidence that confirms this was exactly the case.

Why would they deny it when it can be so easily proven the research was being conducted?

Another interesting factoid about Daszak is that he was employed as an ‘expert fact checker’ by Facebook when it was monitoring and removing ‘misinformation’ about the origins COVID on its platform.

If all of that doesn’t scream coverup then what does?
More...

This has to be a joke. If it is not, the Lancet has lost all credibility and should be shut down immediately.

The fucking Lancet put together a task force to research the origin of covid-19 and put Dr. Covid Gain-of-Function errr....I mean Dr. Peter Daszak as the head of the task force.

Like, WTF!!! What kind of bullshit is this?!

https://covid19commission.org/origins-of-the-pandemic