The Effectiveness of Wearing a Mask Against Covid-19

Discussion in 'Politics' started by BeautifulStranger, Jul 13, 2020.

How Effective is Personal Protection Equipment use by the Public in Reducing Covid-19 Transmission.

  1. Completely effective with proper use.

    1 vote(s)
    5.9%
  2. Very effective in spite of the improper use of PPE by some members of the public.

    6 vote(s)
    35.3%
  3. May help in some cases, but overall, wearing PPE will not significantly reduce transmission rate.

    6 vote(s)
    35.3%
  4. Public utilization of PPE will make no difference in the spread of Covid-19.

    1 vote(s)
    5.9%
  5. PPE worn by the public will be counter productive and actually increase the spread of Covid-19.

    3 vote(s)
    17.6%
  1. The following is an older article from the Center of Disease Control (CDC) concerning Covid-19 and infection of pets.

    If you are a virus, the more transmission vectors you have, the better. Whether it is through pets or MAGA hat wearers, it all helps the spread of this “Beautiful virus”.

    Seemingly easy zoonosis and reverse zoonosis may allow whatever Covid-19 mutation happens to evolve in any affected species to be transmitted to potentially any other warm blooded animal, including (Drumroll, please) humans.

    Anti PPEers: Are you beginning to feel the weight of the seriousness of this global crisis, yet?

    Edit: Let me explicitly spell out the dangers of zoonosis and virus mutations. Covid-19 may evolve into an even more harmful mutation. The large multispecies base this virus has infected allows greater genetic possibilities and the ease in which this virus can jump species means to me, anyway, whatever mutation does evolve, we are going to see it in humans. For reference, each year there is at least one new flu strain.


    Confirmation of COVID-19 in Two Pet Cats in New York

    Media Statement
    For Immediate Release: Wednesday, April 22, 2020
    Contact:
    For inquiries about COVID-19 and animals, contact media@cdc.gov
    For inquiries about the testing and confirmation process for animals, contact APHISpress@usda.gov

    Washington, D.C. April 22, 2020 – The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) today announced the first confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection in two pet cats. These are the first pets in the United States to test positive for SARS-CoV-2.

    The cats live in two separate areas of New York state. Both had mild respiratory illness and are expected to make a full recovery. SARS-CoV-2 infections have been reported in very few animals worldwide, mostly in those that had close contact with a person with COVID-19.

    At this time, routine testing of animals is not recommended. Should other animals be confirmed positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the United States, USDA will post the findingsexternal icon. State animal health and public health officials will take the lead in making determinations about whether animals should be tested for SARS-CoV-2.

    In the NY cases announced today, a veterinarian tested the first cat after it showed mild respiratory signs. No individuals in the household were confirmed to be ill with COVID-19. The virus may have been transmitted to this cat by mildly ill or asymptomatic household members or through contact with an infected person outside its home.

    Samples from the second cat were taken after it showed signs of respiratory illness. The owner of the cat tested positive for COVID-19 prior to the cat showing signs. Another cat in the household has shown no signs of illness.

    Both cats tested presumptive positive for SARS-CoV-2 at a private veterinary laboratory, which then reported the results to state and federal officials. The confirmatory testing was conducted at NVSL and included collection of additional samples. NVSL serves as an international reference laboratory and provides expertise and guidance on diagnostic techniques, as well as confirmatory testing for foreign and emerging animal diseases. Such testing is required for certain animal diseases in the U.S. in order to comply with national and international reporting procedures. The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) considers SARS-CoV-2 an emerging disease, and therefore USDA must report confirmed U.S. animal infections to the OIE.

    Public health officials are still learning about SARS-CoV-2, but there is no evidence that pets play a role in spreading the virus in the United States. Therefore, there is no justification in taking measures against companion animals that may compromise their welfare. Further studies are needed to understand if and how different animals, including pets, could be affected.

    Until we know more, CDC recommends the following:

    • Do not let pets interact with people or other animals outside the household.
    • Keep cats indoors when possible to prevent them from interacting with other animals or people.
    • Walk dogs on a leash, maintaining at least 6 feet from other people and animals.
    • Avoid dog parks or public places where a large number of people and dogs gather.
    If you are sick with COVID-19 (either suspected or confirmed by a test), restrict contact with your pets and other animals, just like you would around other people.

    • When possible, have another member of your household care for your pets while you are sick.
    • Avoid contact with your pet, including petting, snuggling, being kissed or licked, and sharing food or bedding.
    • If you must care for your pet or be around animals while you are sick, wear a cloth face covering and wash your hands before and after you interact with them.
    While additional animals may test positive as infections continue in people, it is important to note that performing this animal testing does not reduce the availability of tests for humans. The U.S. government remains committed to increasing nationwide COVID-19 testing for Americans. In fact, the United States has conducted more than four million COVID-19 tests for humans, which is more tests than the following nations combined: France, the UK, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, India, Austria, Australia, Sweden, and Canada.

    For more information on animals and COVID-19, see: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/animals.html

    For more information about testing in animals, see: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/one_health/downloads/faq-public-on-companion-animal-testing.pdfexternal icon

    https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/s0422-covid-19-cats-NYC.html
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2020
    #291     Jul 28, 2020
  2. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    Some, since the 1600s.

    I'm blonde(ish), I get more vitamin D than I need from 20 minutes in the garden. Life expectancy for most of us in the natural world was about 45 and skin starts to become geriatric after that. I have had enough people in the hospice with skin cancer thanks.

    IMG-20200728-WA0000.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2020
    #292     Jul 28, 2020
    userque likes this.
  3. Nicolem

    Nicolem

    Effective only to a certain extent. But then again, some protection is better than none.
     
    #293     Aug 4, 2020
  4. easymon1

    easymon1

    Big Joe, The Lone Masker.

    biden 40 lone masker.jpg
     
    #294     Apr 24, 2021
  5. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    #295     Apr 25, 2021
  6. Big Joe the Lone Masker! How funny is that? !!!
     
    #296     Apr 25, 2021