when more than half of a certain group hate us then its good to remove ourselves from such group, not healthy. Nobody speaks of segregation, the point was to get away from those who hate an individual based on his/her skin color. And the funniest woke attack on Adams is about his comment on "helping minorities" and that nobody is dependent on the handouts and help of the white majority. Really? Then can we all finally take a deep breath of relief and stop affirmative action, any support payments for the black community and indigenous communities? And while we are at it, the discussion on any slavery compensation is off the table, too. Let those minorities who hate the white majority walk again proudly on the street, having won back their independence from white transfer payments.
Because the election was stolen. Just kidding, lol, I don't believe that. But no, I am not aware how Rasmussen polled in 2022. My point was that they got things right and hence their polls are as reliable or unreliable as any other polling organization. Nobody gets it right all the time.
They got one thing right, they get a lot of other things wrong especially when they do push polling like the one Dilbert bozo quoted.
Same with all other polls, most polls failed miserably post 2016. Shift in decision making that went into voting...enough said on this topic. Rasmussen is a legitimate polling organization. And the answers blacks gave in this poll is telling and should be much more shocking than Adams response.
All that based on a push poll with 61 black people that supposedly represent 40 million. At least you made it obvious what your agenda is.
A legitimate polling organization won't be doing push polls with a phrase popular with neo-nazis. - Rasmussen surveyed 1,000 people. - 13% of respondents were black, meaning that this question was put to 130 black respondents. - 47% of black respondents indicated they disagreed with the statement or were "not sure." What this means is that 61 total black people who were surveyed by Rasmussen disagreed with the statement or were "not sure." Here's the question: Why does it make sense to assume that 61 black folks somehow represent the 40 million black people that live in the United States? Source - Jeff Charles
Translation: Pollsters are forbidden to ask questions that reveal the truth of hatred towards people of white color. Got it, understood. So, polling organizations are delegitimized the moment they include in any of their polls "black lives matter" as well? Nobody has been harmed after the term "its ok to be white" was uttered, name us one example that contradicts my statement. "Black lives matter" is pretty much synonymous with black flash mobs robbing department stores, computer stores, and destroying anything that gets in their way. Screaming and blocking debaters from entering universities. Hitting and punching hundreds, violence against police, hatred against the police...in summary: UTTER VIOLENCE. By the way you should get your facts straight: The term "it's ok to be white" was created as an alt-right trolling campaign and has later been supported by white supremacists and neo-nazis. That does not make the creators nor users of the term white supremacists or neo-nazis. Edit: I agree, though, that the statistical significance can be greatly improved. I doubt it would skew the results by much on this particular question.
Translation: I have no clue what push polling means so let me play the victim like a typical right winger. And here it is, first the victimhood and then the whataboutism. Who mentioned Black lives matter here? If it walks like a duck.... Ya, your bias is pretty obvious. Also it makes perfect sense that you support Russia given their narrative about being 'pro white, christian, anti-woke' country. No wonder you are cheering them in every post.