Sorry, if infowars peddles the worst garbage on the net, I'm not giving them the time of day for the same reason I never bother to waste my time reading a tabloid. I also think it's cute that you and Vanz would accuse people of being pot heads, as if someone who's never touched the stuff would be incapable of seeing the benefit of legalization.
I'd heard others dissing Infowars before the first time I went to the site. Decided I look around and make up my own mind. Some of his stories ARE sensational... things you don't hear elsewhere... yet true nonetheless. Like I said, I've found "his" stories on other sites as well. So "sensational" or not, still as credible as other. Too many people are narrow-minded and simply "shoot the messenger" first thing. I think Alex Jones is waaaay more credible than perceived by some... and you're likely doing yourself a disfavor by dismissing him out of hand. Think about it.... if Jones/Inforwars were consistently inaccurate or outright false, how long could he stay in business? If such were the case, wouldn't people tire of having smoke blown up their skirt and stop patronizing the site?
In other words, you are bugging out because you can’t keep up with my fact based retorts of the propaganda you post daily. As readers may note, I almost never have started a politically based thread. Almost all of my politically based posts are to address various manipulations, fallacies, lies, and mischaracterizations by Leftist poster that are an attempt to mislead people into making decisions that go against their own best interests. You have over 15,800 posts since Dec 8, 2016, soon after Hillary was defeated, for what purpose? You have never retracted anything, that I’ve seen, where you were obviously wrong. In fact, you have even doubled down. So again I ask, what is your opinion of the following people or organizations: 1. Jussie Smollett 2. Michael Avenatti 3. Cristina Blasely Ford 4. ANTIFA You will not answer these questions because it pins you down and you are at least smart enough to fear my followup questions. As far as pot is concerned, the downsides greatly outweigh the benefits. Unless, of course, you personally know better than most governments of the world. Duh. Thinking about it, I now pray, for your sake, that you actually smoke pot. Bottom line, your massive and sustained dump of propagandist garbage will continue to be responded to with facts and principles, by someone who does not have all day to spend on the internet because of his several jobs, myself. As far as others who spend their time countering your efforts, I salute them.
I will look up Alex Jones. However, your argument could be better: After all, aren’t there people still watching CNN, MSNBC, etc?
by "you" i was addressing infowars, I see my correction was too late & as expected, took it as a personal attack.
Don't we hear "false story" and "fake news revealed" about CNN, MSNBC, others from time-to-time/often? Though some people expect Infowars to be "fake and sensational", I have yet to see an example of that. I'm not trying to make make an argument for Jones/Infowars. I do however mostly refute negative claims about them. They are pro USA, pro Constitution... many other sources of news are anything but. I can see how someone who has been "conditioned" to MSM propaganda might see Jones as "sensationalist". As for me, just a source of information.