Rioters try forcing way into bakery, but owner and sons meet them at door with guns — and rioters take their hard day's work elsewhere 'They came at us with bats and threw rocks at our windows ... and then I was like, 'Alright'' https://www.theblaze.com/news/rioters-cleveland-bakery-owners-armed
You said that the protests are ok as long as they don't break the law. I asked you if the Tea Party protest was ok, even though they broke the law. You fail to answer. The question has nothing to do with killing, violence, or anything else specific necessarily. A simple question, begging for a simple answer. But I doubt you'll give a straight answer to this simple question.
Some more context... "Adams issued strict orders: no looting. The protest must be principled. The tea must be dumped in Boston Harbor, but not stolen. One protester couldn’t resist the temptation to personally profit from the protest and stuffed his pockets with tea. His fellow protesters caught him in the act, stripped him naked and forced him to run home in humiliation and disgrace."
I didn't fail to answer. I gave you a very thoughtful and detailed answer. You're all pissy because you're not getting the answer you want and your attempt to trap me (because that is all you are trying to do) is using a false equivalency. Don't like it? Piss the fuck off. I've tried to be civil to you. You want to ask questions to others and then hide and get all ambiguous when asked questions back. Edit: Jews broke the law of the land during Nazi Germany to hide their fellows so they wouldn't be shipped off to camps. This is obviously acceptable. Does this mean I support breaking the laws now and burning stores and beating people? What an asshole question.
I'm not pissy, don't really give af. But I do want to make it clear that you made a statement about these protests: as long as they don't break the law. Yet, won't apply that same logic to another protest: The Tea Party, where they broke the law. Either you are saying all protests should be lawful. Or you are saying only some protests should be lawful. There is no way around this. Again, my point is to show how you assert all sorts of directives, that you can't logically justify. Again, I don't expect you to answer the actual question.
This is a load of complete horseshit. There are no absolutes. You can't apply principles to every known scenario, and peaceful protest is allowed by law and protected in the Constitution of the United States. To say that all laws must be obeyed at all times (which is absolutely not what I said) is foolish. And your attempt to paint me as a hypocrite is disingenuous at best, and trolling at worst. There are always situations where laws should not be followed. Hell, many military organizations worldwide state they will not follow an unjust law. You have no point in this thread other than to troll. I was unsure as to whether you offered any commentary of value or whether you'd be a good person to debate and discuss with. This is apparently not the case. So again, piss off.
I did answer the question, Sally. You don't have to like it. But don't worry, I won't make the mistake of thinking you're here for any type of worthwhile dialog again.
Gun sales surged 80% in may https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/1/gun-sales-surge-80-may-research-firm/ I'm glad I am very well armed and experienced. People are desperate and dangerous, look at the fucking news. Hoping 911 will save you during citywide looting is delusional. We are in very dangerous times.