there are obviously quite a lot of people in usa who admire v. putin. so why can't you just accept the fact that 4 years ago he decided that trump ist the right one for the job ... and this year he chose biden - because he knows what's good for you! end of the story. (lol !!!)
He would call himself more libertarian than Democrat, but he definitely leans democratic more than Republican, which is fine. Occasionally he's over the top, but who isn't? I would not put him in the radical left camp, not even close.
Looks like the faithless electors idea won't work: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-republican-leaders-4-key-states/6298966002/ Republican leaders in Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin throw cold water on ploy to flip electors to Trump
"The main thing saving this nation right now is Trumps utter incompetence. If we had a competent fascist we might be more in trouble but Trump and his inner circle are all morons."
As i told you before, your point above is false--- In Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 104 (2000), the Supreme Court affirmed again, the longstanding fundamental power of the State Legislatures to unilaterally take back the right to vote in any State election, even after the right has been exercised, so long as the Legislature’s action is applied equally throughout the state, so as not to violate equal protection: “The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the electoral college. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1. This is the source for the statement in McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 35 (1892), that the state legislature’s power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by state legislatures in several States for many years after the framing of our Constitution. Id., at 28-33. History has now favored the voter, and in each of the several States the citizens themselves vote for Presidential electors. When the state legislature vests the right to vote for President in its people, the right to vote as the legislature has prescribed is fundamental; and one source of its fundamental nature lies in the equal weight accorded to each vote and the equal dignity owed to each voter. The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors. See id., at 35 (“ ‘[T]here is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated’ “) (quoting S. Rep. No. 395, 43d Congress., 1st Sets., 9 (1874)).” (Emphasis added.)