You are the most qualified to answer that question. Put all the postings in a database and get to work. Post the stats about your findings here. And make a list with the level of BS for each alias so that we can see who is the most "polluting" poster. I guess it will be Turveyd...
I just saw a news item that said the chances of blood blots are much less if you have the injections even if you get infected, so it might be worth it to avoid the blot clots.
Nope, Blood Clotts are increasing as is just over time from having the jab, more jabs + more Time will equal more Clotts. Hugotalks.com Scroll down a bit, video old grey haired female doctor got sacked for trying to alert all, that all she is treating in North Ireland is Blood Clotts and there getting more and more every day, many times standard. Obviously conspiracy site so you won't accept it, despite the fact they've been calling this hoax from the start, 18months ago, the said hoax to push jabs to depopulate the world, he got that 1 right.
In the United Kingdom, after more than 48 million shots of AstraZeneca, the consequences were fatal for 72 people. So that is 0,00015%. The risk of death is approximately 1 in 1 million in all age categories. So that is 0,0001%. A huge difference with what "Dr." Turveyd is posting everywhere.
Unfortunately in UK fatalities from AstraZeneca are high https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports
%% IF its 20%, more likely they may right than if 80% did it/most likely. Actually that just an educated guess; but Fortune magazine online makes a greater point. Montana Become 1st[USa] State to Ban Vaccine Requirements for Employees