Ex-Trump faith adviser indicted on allegations of sexually abusing 12-year-old girl The founder of a Texas megachurch accused of sexually abusing a 12-year-old girl in the 1980s has been indicted, according to the Oklahoma Attorney General's Office. Gateway Church founder Robert Morris, 63, who stepped down in June after the allegations surfaced, was indicted Wednesday on five counts of lewd or indecent acts with a child stemming from incidents in the 1980s. The megachurch in Southlake, Texas, is among the largest in the country. In December 1982, Morris was a traveling evangelist visiting in Hominy with the family of the girl, prosecutors said. The sexual abuse began over Christmas of that year and continued for the next four years. Cindy Clemishire went public with her allegations that Morris molested her for years. Morris has admitted to having “inappropriate sexual behavior with a young lady” decades earlier, and the church later said he was “open and forthright about a moral failure" and had undergone a two-year "restoration process." The grand jury found Morris used his hands and body to touch the girl’s private parts, according to The New York Times, which cited the indictment. The indictment refers to the girl as C.C. Morris previously served on a faith advisory council during Trump’s first term and hosted Trump at Gateway Church over the summer in 2020.
Adam Schiff Mocked Online After Old Footage Surfaces https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/new-adam-schiff-mocked-online-after-old-footage-surfaces-mace/
The Constitution only stipulates one court and that is SCOTUS. Trump and future presidents should only adhere to SCOTUS rulings. (I recall that Biden disregarded even SCOTUS rulings). These Fed districts judges are just that. Their rulings do not apply to the entirety of the nation. They are not SCOTUS. Basically, these judges feel that they have more power than POTUS. Nothing could be more false. They do not have power over the president and his/her actions. Trump should ignore all rulings by Fed district judges going forward.
Fed district judges have no power to place injunctions on any policy implementation acts of any president of any party. Congreff creates these lower courts and this is tantamount to granting Congreff extraordinary powers over The Executive Branch. ---The Executive Branch is one person---The President.
That claim is wildly incorrect. Federal district judges absolutely have the power to issue injunctions against executive actions if they are found to be unconstitutional or in violation of federal law. This is a fundamental part of the judicial branch’s role in checking executive power. Key points for your response: Separation of Powers: The judiciary exists specifically to review and, if necessary, block executive actions that overstep legal or constitutional bounds. Judicial Review: Established in Marbury v. Madison (1803), courts have the authority to interpret laws and determine their constitutionality. Historical Precedents: Federal courts have frequently blocked executive actions, including Trump's travel ban (initially) and Biden's student loan forgiveness plan. Congress and Courts: While Congress creates lower courts, it does not control their rulings—judges interpret and apply the law independently. The idea that "The Executive Branch is one person" is also misleading. The executive branch includes all federal agencies, the military, and law enforcement, all of which operate under the President but are subject to legal constraints.
It's important to understand as well that the idea of judicial review is not in The US Constitution. Rather, it was carved out by Chief Justice John Marshall early in our history, in a partisan takeover of SCOTUS limited powers granted in The Constitution. This was accomplished by Marbury vs Madison. ---The truth is that all 3 branches of government have a say in what's constitutional and what is not. It is not just The Judicial Branch.