https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...mp-protesters-with-bear-repellent-california/ Man in MAGA cap arrested for attacking anti-Trump protesters with bear repellent About a dozen right-wing demonstrators carrying American flags and wearing shirts supporting President Trump’s reelection bid shoved their way into the leftist protest. The anti-Trump crowd, arms linked, stood their ground and pushed back. Then, a man wearing a backward “Make America Great Again” cap over his blond man-bun pulled a canister of bear repellent out of his jeans and sprayed the Southern California crowd with a mist of peppery aerosol. Police announced Sunday that they arrested David Nicholas Dempsey, 32, on a felony charges for allegedly violating his parole, using a prohibited tear gas weapon and assaulting the crowd with a caustic chemical, KTLA reported. “It was these f------ libtards over here, man,” the California man, in a short-sleeve button-down shirt with a marijuana-leaf print, told police in video captured at the protest. “These commies — I didn’t do anything.”
I love how the Washington Post covered this all the way down to the most insignificant of details. I'm kinda miffed though, they didn't include the color of his drawers. Journalism just isn't what it used to be.
yeah, the blonde man bun bit was a bit much. The clickbaity articles must be outsourced an/or handled by the interns
Here is an example of how legal impeachment proceeding progress when undertaken by lawful Congreffmen. H.Res.581 — 105th Congress (1997-1998) Introduced in House (10/07/1998) Authorizes the House Committee on the Judiciary, acting as a whole or by any subcommittee thereof appointed by the chairman for the purposes hereof and in accordance with the rules of the Committee, to investigate fully and completely whether sufficient grounds exist for the House to exercise its constitutional power to impeach President Clinton. Requires the Committee to report to the House such resolutions, articles of impeachment, or other recommendations as it deems proper.
Trump's impeachment process has been faster than Clinton's and Nixon's 3 hours ago https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-...xon-020a3124-aa12-454d-b42e-a244e04096a5.html
That's a bullshit apples and oranges comparison. Note that with nixon and clinton they are calling an inquiry "when the house voted" but with Trump the inquiry begins before the house votes, allegedly, but not constitutionally. In addition, things move faster with Trump because there was a kerfluffle over the letter so he just released it, which is not a bad thing, but sped the process up considerably- versus with clinton and nixon it took longer to uncover what the core allegation was.
Notice the difference in Dem/Media tone to the finger--- POWERFUL, FORCEFUL, RIGHTEOUS AND CONFIDENT--- DISRESPECTFUL AND UNPROFESSIONAL---
Speaker of the House, equal branch. To be fair both addressing their juniors. Jan Brewer is 75 now. Jan irritated about a critique of her book describing a shared meeting, Nancy about the butchery of allies. Jan said she was wagging her finger crossly, Nancy said it was just a passing gesture leaving. Just more conservatives getting angry about things they made up themselves. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1950219401751543/?_fb_noscript=1
Trump has been very very transparent. I am glad they are now blockading Schiff as this is all a kangaroo deal.