Getting a little circular isn't it. In my post I said he was correct on two points that confirmed what I said. Now I am being told that he is correct in confirming my post that said that he was confirming the previous points I made. Perhaps you two could just skip the foreplay and get a room together and get on with it. Sheesh. Not to worry, Here4Bullshit will have a whole new batch of new links from his media matters package in the morning, which you can lap right up.
The problem is yo lost the start of the conversation which was refuting the claim that the President has sole power over foreign affairs. I cited just two examples which proves it is not true, I could cite more but it would be superfluous to put down an absolute claim. You raised a situation where a President could act unilaterally but as was pointed out, it is without legal authority or any substance. So as was pointed out B1S2's claim was false and nothing you said changed that. That is all I pointed out. it is not circular, you just lost the train.
If the charge is that I did not read all of here4bullshit's posts and not the preceding ones, I plead guilty, and do that most days. I stand by my statement in regard to his post and how it may square with some previous posts of others, is not of concern to me. He has a constant flow going and I tune in or out as I wish, and dont lose much for doing so. Expect the same tomorrow or any day. He will have ten posts with ten links before sun-up. I may pick one out and respond to it or not without reading the others. If it improves your life to read all his shiite, go for it.
Except your wrongful response was to Ocho, not me; I merely pointed out the non-sequitur. Don't get triggered, cupcake
One thing to remember is that in The US, the executive branch is unitary------ie made up of one person---and that individual has the sole voice for establishing foreign policy. Most Libprogs and Morlibons are unable to comprehend this basic Constitutional tenet.
Yeah Rain Man character who was highly autistic simply repeated gibberish over and over.... Next you will be telling us when People's Court is on...
The president of The USA, having the sole voice in the establishment of USA foreign policy, sends troops wherever he/she desires, withdraws troops wherever and whenever he/she desires, applies tariffs or removes tariffs, appoints or removes ambassadors and Secretary of State who carry his/her foreign policy to each nation and answers to him/her. This is only a small list of the examples of how the president establishes and projects US foreign policy. Congreff does not determine the direction of US foreign policy. ---By the way, recently when Kashoggi was murdered, the country looked to the president to see how we would react and it was his sole decision on what to do. Finally, if the president didn't have the sole voice on foreign policy, then why would the false narrative concerning the Ukranian call be able to be put forth at all?