Actually, I know a little, but only a little, of the dark history of the Radical Left. I understand their mentality and modus operandi to enough of a degree as to be able to predict some of their actions, such as when Trump’s approval ratings get near 52 week highs. Edit: Try to look up Hillary’s, Soros’s, etc. home addresses. Not easy, is it? It is likely we are both smarter than Sayoc, right? After all, this alleged MAGA man was so stupid to realize that his actions would not do damage to the Republican’s in the 2018 elections but was smart enough to find the hardest to obtain home addresses in the world? What was it, a dozen names? How naive are you?
Haven't bothered to read the court transcripts but "targeting" certain people doesn't mean sending bombs to their home addresses necessarily. If I'm a retarded Trumper, I can address a bomb to Hillary and ship it to the Clinton foundation, address it to Tapper and send it to CNN, address it to Soros, and send it to Soros .Corp, etc... Not to mention these people are so hated by deranged right wingers, it wouldn't surprise me if the Hannity's of the world haven't doxxed them and leaked their home address already.
The key to solving gun violence is to have more law-abiding citizens carrying guns. You'll soon see that this violence will be curtailed to a trickle.
Are you serious????? Unfortunately there is no solution. Only full gun repossession and 2nd amendment loss will help to decrease it, and it will take minimum a generation. I am a proud 2nd amendment supporter. Realistically few things we can go is cancel gun shows, and institute mandatory background checks across all states. Will it stop all mass shootings, absolutely not. But it will help in certain instances. To make it a reality both side need to give. Dems can offer a carry across all states once one passes background check. The last thing, all media companies should agree and not mention shooter by name, let it be a nameless face, this will also detour some lunatics.
As can be seen here----having other people armed is the answer to gun violence. https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/09/firefighter-man-walmart-springfield-missouri-shooter-weapons/ An armed man who was reportedly wearing body armor and carrying tactical weapons with more than 100 rounds of ammunition around a Walmart in Missouri was held at gunpoint Thursday afternoon by an “off-duty” firefighter. Described by some reports as a “former” firefighter, the good Samaritan waited with the heavily-armed man until authorities arrived. The Springfield Police Department was called at around 4:10 p.m. on Thursday afternoon after the armed man walked into Walmart, grabbed a cart and started recording himself while walking around the store, according to KY3. The store manager proceeded to pull the fire alarm to get everyone out of the store. The armed man went through an emergency exit and that is when the former firefighter sprung into action, the police say. The former firefighter pulled out his gun and held the man at gunpoint until the police arrived. The police arrived to put the man in custody within three minutes of receiving the call of an active shooter, KY3 reported.
Yeah. And what if that that cat took off running? Then what. The firefighter puts one in his back? He's not trained nor is he empowered to make that decision. That's where the problem lies B1. There's a very fine line there. Had the idiot started shooting, sure, the firefighter becomes a hero. But he puts one in this guys back with the first shot fired, the firefighter stands a damn good chance of doing some time for manslaughter. If you have tons and tons of armed citizens carrying weapons, I don't care if they did buy them legally and don't have any priors... you are going to get incidents of vigilante behavior. I know one or two people with a concealed carry permit that I just scratch my head and roll my eyes over because I know them. They smoke dope, they drink, and they ascribe to all kinds of off the wall crap. Yet they get a CC. So no... once again B1... you're wrong. Or trolling.
Not to mention the "active shooter" could just as well been one of these "right to carry" attention whores making a youtube video.
As a Conservative, I am amazed when I run into people all the time who support the notion that universal background checks are needed to stop the mass shooting phenomenon. This is a Liberal canard. Of course, we already have background checks when you buy a gun at a dealer and so Libprogs think that they can make a case that if the checks were done at gun shows and during private sales that the hysteria would stop. --This is what they call "the gun show loophole". ---Here's the truth though---How many mass shootings have occurred with guns purchased in private sales?------The answer is ZERO----
Machete control? Would that be the answer? So far, crickets from The Left and The Media. "A Southern California man went on a rampage of stabbing and robbery Wednesday that left four victims dead and two wounded, according to news reports. The Associated Press reported the unidentified 33-year-old man was arrested about 6:30 p.m. when he was spotted leaving a 7-Eleven he had just robbed in Santa Ana, southeast of Los Angeles. The man had stabbed a guard at the store and taken the man’s gun. The guard, who later died at a hospital, was the final victim of a spree that started about two hours earlier in the nearby town of Garden Grove. According to the AP, Garden Grove police Lt. Carl Whitney told reporters the man’s motives appeared to be “robbery, hate homicide.”" The attacker was armed with “some sort of machete knives,” https://www.westernjournal.com/man-full-anger-kills-4-southern-california-machete-rampage/