Here all the judges on Trumptard evidence conspiracies. Georgia, I quote “The court finds that there is no evidence that the ballots referenced in the petition were received after 7pm on election day,” Michigan, I quote "This evidence is inadmissable as hearsay. The assertion that Connarn was informed by an unknown individual what ‘other hired poll workers at her table’ had been told is inadmissable hearsay within hearsay, and plaintiffs have provided no hearsay exception for either level of hearsay,” Michigan again, I quote "The complaint does not specify when, where or by whom plaintiff was excluded. Nor does the complaint provide any details about why the alleged exclusion occurred,” Michigan again, I quote “Plaintiffs do not offer any affidavits or special eyewitness evidence to substantiate their assertions,” Judge Kenny wrote. “Plaintiffs merely assert in their complaint, ‘Hundreds or thousands of ballots were duplicated solely by Democratic Party inspectors and then counted.’ Plaintiffs’ allegation is mere speculation. “The motion is based upon speculation and conjecture. Absent any evidence of an improper practice, the court cannot identify if this alleged violation occurred and, if it did, the frequency of such violations. “Plaintiffs have made only a claim but have offered no evidence to support their assertions.” And again "“Ms Carone’s description of the events at the TCF Centre does not square with any of the other affidavits. There are no other reports of lost data, or tabulating machines that jammed repeatedly every hour during the count. “Neither Republican nor Democratic challengers nor city officials substantiate her version of events. The allegations simply are not credible.” From pennsylvania, I quote "“The campaign never alleges that any ballot was fraudulent or cast by an illegal voter. It never alleges that any defendant treated the Trump campaign or its votes worse than it treated the Biden campaign or its votes. Calling something discrimination does not make it so.”" From Nevada, I quote "Judge Russell said he had “reviewed the full evidentiary record” and “considered, without limitation, all evidence submitted to the court”." "“Most of these declarations were self-serving statements of little or no evidentiary value,” he said. “The court nonetheless considers the totality of the evidence provided by contestants in reaching and ruling upon the merits of their claims.” From Arizona, I quote "Justice Brutinel said Ms Ward had failed to “present any evidence of misconduct, illegal votes, or that the Biden electors did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office" From Wisconsin, I quote "“The President failed to point to even one vote cast in this election by an ineligible voter, yet he asks this court to disenfranchise over 220,000 voters,”"
inb4 GWB defends pastor against cancel culture from the baptists: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/08/us/stewart-allen-clark-pastor-melania-trump.html Missouri Pastor Who Sermonized That Women Must Look Good for Their Husbands Goes on Leave Stewart-Allen Clark, whose comments were admonished by a Baptist group, is “seeking professional counseling,” his church said.
Obviously you are unable to distinguish the difference between job performance and cancel culture. Two totally separate items. Stop deliberately conflating them.
are public relations not part of job performance? Why are you against companies improving relations with their customer base? Why do you keep conflating private companies business decisions to some conspiratorial effort to giving into cancel mob?