Jan. 6 committee set to dutifully detail Donald Trump's dereliction of duty https://www.azcentral.com/story/opi...g-donald-trumps-dereliction-duty/10104045002/ Donald Trump apparently didn’t read the fine print in the presidential job description. He apparently didn't even read the regular print. The responsibilities of the president of the United States are laid out fairly well and in big letters in the Constitution. Of particular interest to the members of the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection is Article 2, Section 3, which outlines the duties of the president. It’s not a terribly long list, surprisingly, and very easy to read. It includes a requirement that the president “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” At the hearing scheduled for Thursday the members of the committee are set to describe in some detail how Trump failed to execute those duties on Jan. 6. 'He had a duty to act' but did not “This is going to open people’s eyes in a big way,” said Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a member of the committee. If only that were true. Another member of the committee, Democratic Rep. Elaine Lauria said, “The commander in chief is the only person in the Constitution whose duty is explicitly laid out to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed. I look at it as a dereliction of duty. (Trump) didn’t act. He had a duty to act.” You could argue that there is a lot of dereliction going around. Kinzinger, for example, has been the object of vicious threats and derision since he agreed to participate in the committee. At the last hearing, he played some of the nastier messages he’s received, many of which are not just suggestions of violence but promises. And they’ve not just come to his office, but to his home. In one message, the caller says, “We know where your family is, and we're going to get you, you little c---sucker.” Another says, “Gonna get your wife, gonna get your kids.” Threats recognized, threats ignored A letter arrived, addressed to Kinzinger’s wife, saying Kinzinger “will be executed” and that his wife and their child will “be joining Adam in hell, too!” In addition to Trump's ongoing behavior, the leadership of the Republican party is proving what dereliction of duty is all about. It has been pointed out how Republican leaders in the House and the Senate made very public and repeated calls for protection when Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was threatened. They called for increased security around the homes of the justices who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade after protesters showed up on the street. But, none of those same top Republicans have called for protection for Kinzinger or his family. None have gone on TV condemning the threats. None of them tweeted the need to respect the congressional process and even praising Kinzinger for honoring his sworn oath. Deleriction of duty versus ... duty Instead, Kinzinger and fellow Republican Liz Cheney are constantly rebuked by members of their own party for daring to seek the truth about Dear Leader. And because Republican leadership has abandoned them, it emboldens the crazies who reach out to Kinzinger each day with threats about “getting” him and his family. Meantime, Kinzinger, Cheney and the rest of the committee go on with their work. Thursday will be about all the opportunities Trump had to quell the violence on Jan. 6 and all the ways he failed to do so. Faithfully executing the laws “We will go through pretty much minute by minute during that time frame, from the time he left the stage at the Ellipse, came back to the White House, and really sat in the White House, in the dining room, with his advisers urging him continuously to take action, to take more action,” Rep. Luria said. And yet Trump did not, ignoring that part of the Constitution that required him to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” In spite of that, Trump is not derided by Republicans. Instead, he is lionized, while Kinzinger is threatened, making the committee itself a starkly sad study in contrasts. Dereliction versus devotion. Dishonor versus honor.
More batshit, anyone? Former Trump White House aide who met with January 6 panel attacks witnesses, lawmakers in profane and sexist rant https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/20/politics/garrett-ziegler-rant/index.html A former Trump White House aide who met with the January 6 committee earlier this week went on a profane and sexist rant on a livestream after his testimony, where he railed against the lawmakers and attacked other witnesses, according to audio posted to his Telegram. The aide, Garrett Ziegler, met with the House panel on Tuesday. Lawmakers were likely interested in hearing from him because of his ties to one of the most shocking episodes of the 2020 election saga: A White House meeting where then-President Donald Trump’s outside allies tried to convince him to declare martial law and use the military to seize voting machines. Former Trump White House aide Garrett Ziegler, left, waits Tuesday near a room on Capitol Hill where the January 6 committee conducts its closed-door witness interviews. In the 27-minute livestream, Ziegler used vulgar and misogynistic language to attack Cassidy Hutchinson and Alyssa Farah Griffin, two women who worked for the Trump White House but have since publicly broken from the former President and cooperated with the January 6 panel. He also accused the January 6 House select committee of being “anti-White,” without any evidence. (The nine-member panel is led by Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, who is Black.) “They’re Bolsheviks,” Ziegler said in the stream, referring to the far-left communists who led the Soviet Union, “so, they probably do hate the American founders and most White people in general. This is a Bolshevistic anti-White campaign. If you can’t see that, your eyes are freaking closed. And so, they see me as a young Christian who they can try to basically scare, right?” The livestream is audio-only, but the voice on the recording matches past videos of Ziegler. CNN has reached out to the January 6 committee and Ziegler’s attorney seeking comment. At the White House, Ziegler was an aide to Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro, who was charged with contempt of Congress for defying the panel’s subpoena. (He pleaded not guilty.) The New York Times previously reported that Ziegler escorted some of Trump’s most controversial allies into the White House for the now-infamous December 2020 meeting where martial law was discussed. In Ziegler’s online postings, he disputed parts of the Times story. On his Telegram channel, Ziegler continues to promote debunked conspiracy theories about the 2020 election. He falsely claimed in recent posts that “the election was stolen” and that the January 6 attack on the US Capitol “was one of the greatest orchestrated false flags in history.”
You have to see the 4-minute video at the top of the linked page in the above post to truly appreciate the GOP crazy. Only the best people... And I think if you were to look up goon or henchman on Google, you'd probably see this:
Fucking ignorant Trumpers: ‘It’s a kangaroo court’: in key state, Trump backers dismiss January 6 hearings https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/22/donald-trump-supporters-january-6-hearings Residents of rural northern Wisconsin, a key swing state, have not been shaken by slickly planned congressional testimony Millions of Americans spent Thursday evening stunned, appalled and amused by the season finale of the congressional hearings into the storming of the Capitol in the waning days of Donald Trump’s presidency, and his part in the deadly insurrection. The slickly planned primetime hearing showed Trump refusing to call off the insurgents for more than three hours as he watched Fox News coverage from the White House dining room on 6 January 2021. The House committee heard how Secret Service officers protecting the vice-president, Mike Pence, were telling their families they may not make it home alive. Members of the committee said the evidence showed that Trump lied, betrayed his oath of office, and summoned a mob to Washington to try to overturn the presidential election. It was, said Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger, “a stain on our history”. But in the heart of Trump country, there’s a different take. “I looked up kangaroo court,” said Terri Burl, a Republican activist in rural northern Wisconsin, a key swing state that Trump won in 2016 but lost four years later. “I’m like, yes, that’s exactly what this is. What’s it supposed to prove?” Burl’s loyalty to the former president – she was an early member of Trump for Women – has not been shaken by Thursday’s testimony from former Trump administration officials. She watched for almost an hour before giving up because she said that while “the violence and destruction is not OK as people forced their way into the Capitol”, the hearing was a one-sided attack on the former president rather than an attempt to get at the truth. “There was an annoying and troubling Hollywood movie look to these theatrical hearings, as if they’re acting in a badly done B-list movie,” she said. But Burl, a former social worker and substitute teacher, did tune in unlike other members of Oneida county Republican party and most other Trump supporters. “I haven’t watched it,” said Kathleen Silbernagel, the party secretary and a retired programme manager for a Pepsi subsidiary. “It’s a joke. Most conservatives feel that it is a kangaroo court. Liberals already hate him so it’s not going to affect them. But how it will affect independent people, who are always in the middle, is hard to tell.” Opinion polls suggest that the hearings have not produced the devastating shift in public opinion against Trump that some Democrats hoped for. Nor have they slackened the grip of Trumpism on the Republican party. Even as evidence spilled out that the then-president “commanded an armed mob to overturn the election”, few Republican politicians have turned away from Trump. Those that do pay the price. Representative Liz Cheney, who broke with her party leadership to serve as one of Trump’s chief accusers on the House select committee, is facing a drubbing in next month’s primary for her seat in Congress at the hands of a rival who has positioned herself as defender of the former president. But while the hearings may not have shaken the commitment of the faithful, the weeks of testimony have compounded a sense of doubt among some Republicans that, even as Trump touts the idea of running for president again, he carries too much baggage to win another election. A poll by the Wisconsin’s Marquette law school released on Thursday showed that nationally most Republican voters have heard about the January 6 hearings only “a little” or “nothing at all”. Just 35% of Republicans have been paying attention compared to a clear majority of Democrats. It is no surprise then that opinion on Trump’s culpability divides along partisan lines with Republicans overwhelmingly clearing him and Democrats certain of his culpability. Oneida county Republicans make many of the arguments heard across Trump country to disparage the January 6 hearings. “They’re painting Trump as though he incited this riot,” said the county Republican vice chair, Peter Biolo, who has also avoided watching the hearings. “They got to the Capitol and the Capitol police let them in. They didn’t storm the Capitol as is being reported. And the one person that was shot, that female veteran, was shot by a Capitol police officer.” The hearings are instead viewed as part of a broader witch-hunt against the former president, alongside official investigations into whether his company fiddled taxes and fraudulently inflated property values to obtain cheaper loans. The bad news for those who want to see Trump run again is that a key part of the electorate does not see it that way. Two-thirds of those independent voters who are following the hearings closely say Trump bears “a lot of responsibility” for the storming of the Capitol, according to the Marquette law school poll. Even among independents not paying close attention, a majority say he bears some responsibility. Burl describes herself as heartbroken that Trump is not still president even if she was critical of his style when he was in the White House, particularly his aggressive tweeting. “I miss him. I’ve never felt that way about really any other Republican president, except maybe Ronald Reagan,” she said. But Burl looks at her own state where both Trump’s victory in 2016 and loss four years later were each decided by a little more than 20,000 votes, less than 1% of the ballot. “I’m a Trump supporter all the way. But he has too much baggage now, just piled up and up. Baggage that makes it harder for him to win over those middle of the road voters,” she said. Silbernagel agrees. Biolo does not. He wants to see Trump run again because he doesn’t think anyone else can keep Trumpism alive. “There are probably people like Trump out there but would they have his qualities? Would they be as direct, as confrontational?” he said. That divide is heard across Wisconsin where the commitment to Trumpism remains strong but there are creeping doubts about whether Trump is the man to continue to lead it. While most Republicans want to see the former president running again, a significant minority oppose it. They warn that “he alienated a segment of the voting population that he’s unlikely to get back” and say it is “time to move on from Trump. He had his day, did much good, and exposed a great deal. But his level of chaos and divisiveness should be left behind. We need a younger guy with less baggage and fewer scores to settle.” Charles Franklin, director of the Marquette poll, said his surveys reflect that gap. “We continue to see Donald Trump is very popular within the party but more Republicans like him than want him to run for election again. A difference – both in the state and the national polling – is somewhere between 75% and 80% of Republicans say they have a favourable opinion of Trump. But it’s more like 60% of Republicans that would like to see him run again,” he said. “In theory, 60% is plenty to win a primary so it hardly means that they’re abandoning him. But you are seeing some slippage between looking back on him and having a favourable view and looking to the future.” That raises fears among some Republicans who suspect that while Trump might walk the primaries, particularly if others fear the political cost of running against him, he has already lost once against Biden by a massive 7m votes in the popular ballot. They also fear that the House committee hearings are providing an abundance of material for the Democrats to flood the airwaves with clips showing former Trump loyalists accusing him of leading an attempted coup. Still, any Republican running against Trump had better feel sure of beating him or risk killing his own political career. For now, in Wisconsin as elsewhere, loyalty to Trump continues to be a litmus test for most Republican voters in who they vote for. Franklin said that includes buying into the claims that the 2020 election was stolen and that the January 6 hearings are part of the plot. “If you want to be a good Republican in the current party, you have to signal to the voters who have bought into the election fraud story,” he said.
Heh. Lezbo Cheney. Soon to be the former rep from Wyoming. Future lobbyist and CNN contributor. Maybe she will show you her "stuff" Jeffrey Toobin style.