I don't trade stocks, but I invest in them, so I am simply giving the stock traders the opinion of a long term stock investor so we are not looking for a bottom, we already had one in 2009 I see no reason to get flat up here but that doesn't mean I am not worried Not about a bottom, but about a top carry on, just thought you may want to know who and what you may be trading against sees it
no, I don't talk about stocks. Most of it is just in index funds that anybody could buy. But I don't think amateurs should buy individual stocks, and I never buy one until I have paid a professional (and they are not cheap) to do due diligence on it for me.
2 ticks on the prior and two ticks on the new. Notice that each hold has two cends: beginning and end. 15 x ends x ticks at each end. 15 x 2 x 2 = 7.5 points. Really?
the volume 8 cases are: P1, T1, P2, T2P, T2F, NOT T2P, NOT T2P, and P3F The End Effect, I annotate at all times is P3P as a class; to be clear about an End Effect recicisely, I go further and use subsets. In the volume 8 cases you see a two letter and a three letter diffrentiation. I use two letters in the trading fractal. When I get to the last price move (move 3), I letter according to the subfractal of the move 3. There you see 4 more cases. So this means there are four trading fractal cases and 4 sub fractal cases. this is a consistency. The common element is T2P. It would be T2 for the trading frctal, but I use T2P instead because it keeps me alert and on the ball. as you see the is the lst peak of the trend. It is P3P (35 diffrentiable elements), BUT the P3P can also be a failure to end the trend. I name this P3F once I learned that every bar has to have a name. daring has cited an authority who wrote a book that he believes is a good book. Anyone who chooses can write. Anyone who chooses can read. this is a proof of two wrongs do not make a write. you're citing moves. 2 is to in your citation. I am citing cases which are names of elements in sequence. We are both wrote.