There's something strange about unprofitable traders teaching a system as if it were profitable. Would you go to a mechanic who has never fixed a car? Fair enough. To me, investments are things you sit back and forget about, or update like once a year. I check/monitor my positions daily. Just in case. Sometimes I'm in and out in a few days.
What's strange about that? That seems to be par for the course in the trading education industry. Don't you think it way more strange that a "profitable" trader would give away his system for free to strangers? To me, not really, because the person cannot give it away. It has to be taken by the person who wants it - i.e., the person has to WORK to get it. Not to be confused with saying that everyone is capable of doing the work.
I don't understand your request fully. The list of my volume symbols are as told: increasing red, decreasing red, increasing black, decreasing black, trough and peaking. They are more than sufficient to be with my other set of price symbols to form a data set for me to determine where I am in an OOE. I feel that you are doing a renaming exercise.
thank you for responding. In trading, it is good to know where you are in a trend. If this is true, then each volume bar will have a name. Also, if this is true, the names will be defined mathematically. Also, if this is true, then there mathematical definitions will lead to an Order Of Events for the defined names. As my be determined by searching, the scientific development of market systems has only gotten so far. AS time passes, the market research will move forward and more and more about markets will be defined. I follow those who fund research. It is very primitive so far. Thus, we see the kind of results the financial industry gets. For me, the cases of adjacent price bars gate or kill measures in volume bars. When volume bars are measured there are 8 cases plus the End Effect. I place the categories of End Effects in ranges. and they are comprised of 9 categories plus two singularities each of which have a specific rule. The total number of possible End Effects is 35. What causes the market to operate in a finite case manner is that there are no continuous functions in markets to work with. Why continuous functions got eliminated is that all market variables have "granularity". ET is now running a thread with a list of pronouncements from people who are pundits, etc... Over time their comments have become accepted even though they inherently disregard the systemmic required foundations when exampining markets. I feel that the paradigm that describes the market and its Parametric Measure dictate that a RDBMS must be used. I was able to complete my system for the market's operation by classifying its parts in proper subsets and then determining the set of relations of all of the parts. The power of thr RDBMS (Relative Data Base Management System) is well known in several applications. By using any complete platform which has the types of operators and instructions, it is possible to have a complete operational RDBMS for markets. Markets have participants and instruments. They combine using the market's operating rules. From this, a system emerges that has parts and their definitions. The added ingredient that makes systems work are sets of Orders of Events of that establish the character of the subsystems. There are five.
=============== Ist paragraph is a classsic quote-amazingly accurste..LOL I dont thnik thats [2nd paragraph]]is strange, the world is full of thoughtless /simple minded people.It is true Rch Dennis said you could put it in in the Wall Street journal .Many would not get it.BUT HE NEVER DID THAT. ============================= Consider yourself blessed if you get some pattern fragments Some may give a good system away; because they have an excellant one.....Talk is cheap.
What's strange about that is an unprofitable trader has no "system" to share. It would be like me teaching a class on bird calls. I have no problem with people presenting ideas and sharing information. I do that all the time. But a lot people give advice and frame it as if it's coming from them as a profitable trader... followed shortly by the PMs to sell you something... you know, because they see potential in you Oh, I forgot to mention: for a limited time, I will teach you how to do bird calls for only $500. You can attract all sorts of birds with these calls. Even ones that have been extinct for hundreds of years! Me and my group of bird callers do that on a daily basis. We even had a pterodactyl show up once! But don't ask us for proof; we don't allow cameras or observers.
When I work with someone he gives me proof he is working. You have done that in many ways. the proof you have offered to us indicates that you will never learn to trade successfully. Certainly I am not asking you to try to prove me wrong. Why would I? There is no incentive you can provide to me either. Do you allow recorders at your bird call meetings? I make videos of my meetings. Or nowadays, the host of my GoToMeetings makes the videos. Do you follow the humor of DH talking to MS? Did you figure out what neither knows?
I also think it's funny when people frame themselves as profitable traders. Like when people will say something like "I've been trading full-time for two years" and neglect to admit they've lost money during that time. But you never know. Some of them might actually be profitable. I just get annoyed when I follow someone for a while in the hope of learning something useful from them but then discover they have been lying about some things, or lying by omission.