The botched US raid that led to the hostage crisis

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Apr 2, 2007.

  1. The botched US raid that led to the hostage crisis

    By Patrick Cockburn
    Published: 03 April 2007

    A failed American attempt to abduct two senior Iranian security officers on an official visit to northern Iraq was the starting pistol for a crisis that 10 weeks later led to Iranians seizing 15 British sailors and Marines.

    Early on the morning of 11 January, helicopter-born US forces launched a surprise raid on a long-established Iranian liaison office in the city of Arbil in Iraqi Kurdistan. They captured five relatively junior Iranian officials whom the US accuses of being intelligence agents and still holds.

    In reality the US attack had a far more ambitious objective, The Independent has learned. The aim of the raid, launched without informing the Kurdish authorities, was to seize two men at the very heart of the Iranian security establishment.

    Better understanding of the seriousness of the US action in Arbil - and the angry Iranian response to it - should have led Downing Street and the Ministry of Defence to realise that Iran was likely to retaliate against American or British forces such as highly vulnerable Navy search parties in the Gulf. The two senior Iranian officers the US sought to capture were Mohammed Jafari, the powerful deputy head of the Iranian National Security Council, and General Minojahar Frouzanda, the chief of intelligence of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, according to Kurdish officials.

    The two men were in Kurdistan on an official visit during which they met the Iraqi President, Jalal Talabani, and later saw Massoud Barzani, the President of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), at his mountain headquarters overlooking Arbil.

    "They were after Jafari," Fuad Hussein, the chief of staff of Massoud Barzani, told The Independent. He confirmed that the Iranian office had been established in Arbil for a long time and was often visited by Kurds obtaining documents to visit Iran. "The Americans thought he [Jafari] was there," said Mr Hussein.

    Mr Jafari was accompanied by a second, high-ranking Iranian official. "His name was General Minojahar Frouzanda, the head of intelligence of the Pasdaran [Iranian Revolutionary Guard]," said Sadi Ahmed Pire, now head of the Diwan (office) of President Talabani in Baghdad. Mr Pire previously lived in Arbil, where he headed the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), Mr Talabani's political party.

    The attempt by the US to seize the two high-ranking Iranian security officers openly meeting with Iraqi leaders is somewhat as if Iran had tried to kidnap the heads of the CIA and MI6 while they were on an official visit to a country neighbouring Iran, such as Pakistan or Afghanistan. There is no doubt that Iran believes that Mr Jafari and Mr Frouzanda were targeted by the Americans. Mr Jafari confirmed to the official Iranian news agency, IRNA, that he was in Arbil at the time of the raid.

    In a little-noticed remark, Manouchehr Mottaki, the Iranian Foreign Minister, told IRNA: "The objective of the Americans was to arrest Iranian security officials who had gone to Iraq to develop co-operation in the area of bilateral security."

    US officials in Washington subsequently claimed that the five Iranian officials they did seize, who have not been seen since, were "suspected of being closely tied to activities targeting Iraq and coalition forces". This explanation never made much sense. No member of the US-led coalition has been killed in Arbil and there were no Sunni-Arab insurgents or Shia militiamen there.

    The raid on Arbil took place within hours of President George Bush making an address to the nation on 10 January in which he claimed: "Iran is providing material support for attacks on American troops." He identified Iran and Syria as America's main enemies in Iraq though the four-year-old guerrilla war against US-led forces is being conducted by the strongly anti-Iranian Sunni-Arab community. Mr Jafari himself later complained about US allegations. "So far has there been a single Iranian among suicide bombers in the war-battered country?" he asked. "Almost all who involved in the suicide attacks are from Arab countries."

    It seemed strange at the time that the US would so openly flout the authority of the Iraqi President and the head of the KRG simply to raid an Iranian liaison office that was being upgraded to a consulate, though this had not yet happened on 11 January. US officials, who must have been privy to the White House's new anti-Iranian stance, may have thought that bruised Kurdish pride was a small price to pay if the US could grab such senior Iranian officials.

    For more than a year the US and its allies have been trying to put pressure on Iran. Security sources in Iraqi Kurdistan have long said that the US is backing Iranian Kurdish guerrillas in Iran. The US is also reportedly backing Sunni Arab dissidents in Khuzestan in southern Iran who are opposed to the government in Tehran. On 4 February soldiers from the Iraqi army 36th Commando battalion in Baghdad, considered to be under American control, seized Jalal Sharafi, an Iranian diplomat.

    The raid in Arbil was a far more serious and aggressive act. It was not carried out by proxies but by US forces directly. The abortive Arbil raid provoked a dangerous escalation in the confrontation between the US and Iran which ultimately led to the capture of the 15 British sailors and Marines - apparently considered a more vulnerable coalition target than their American comrades.

    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2414760.ece
     
  2. Thank you for posting this. It brings a much needed context to this latest incident instead of the "hero-posturing" I'm seeing on the BBC and Australian networks.
     
  3. Yeah Alex... but it does not fit into the war mongering attitude of the klansmen. They have been neutered by the US voters during the 2006 elections, but they are still bent on wreaking havoc round the world. The kool aid drinkers on this forum wants to believe that Iran is the cause of all evil, just as they still believe in the Iraqi WMDs. :D
     
  4. Your true stripes often come out.

    You're pro Iranian.

    Interesting.

    So in your view Iran is righteous and acting as peacekeepers in Iraq while America and the U.K. are evil "Klansmen" who are "wreaking havoc" around the world.

    Of course you've defined those who disagree as "kool aid drinkers". Praise Allah.
     
  5. More fellatio thinking from a republisucker....

    Fallacy of false dilemma....

    You don't have to be a supporter of Iran to be opposed to the actions of the repugniklans...one can view both as wrong.

    Doh!

    Dumb as they come you are...


     
  6. Whatever.

    Democratic dove John Edwards on Iran:

    ....... the former senator firmly declared that "all options must remain on the table," in regards to dealing with Iran, whose nuclear ambition "threatens the security of Israel and the entire world."

    "Let me be clear: Under no circumstances can Iran be allowed to have nuclear weapons," Edwards said. "For years, the US hasn’t done enough to deal with what I have seen as a threat from Iran. As my country stayed on the sidelines, these problems got worse."

    http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Edwards_Iran_must_know_world_wont_0123.html


    Or Peacenik John Dean: "... under no circumstances will a Democratic Administration ever allow Iran to become a nuclear power."

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2006/03/update_parsing_howard_deans_ir_1.asp

    Or St. Obama: "On the other hand, having a radical Muslim theocracy in possession of nuclear weapons is worse. So I guess my instinct would be to err on not having those weapons in the possession of the ruling clerics of Iran. ... And I hope it doesn't get to that point. But realistically, as I watch how this thing has evolved, I'd be surprised if Iran blinked at this point."

    "... I think there are elements within Pakistan right now--if Musharraf is overthrown and they took over, I think we would have to consider going in and taking those bombs out, because I don't think we can make the same assumptions about how they calculate risks."


    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/printedition/chi-0409250111sep25,1,4555304.story

    Hillary? I don't have time to print volumes.

    So of course only Republicans are war mongering in Iran.....

    You're a tool.
     
  7. Maji, in all fairness it seems to be quite the opposite. Z10, the article and this thread try to convince us that the US is the cause of all evil, not Iran, that when Iran kidnaps 15 UK sailors operating under a UN mandate in Iraqi waters, it's not Iran's, it's not the UK's, it's this country's fault.
     
  8. Evil, evil, evil doers...

    LMAO...

    US played politics in a covert fashion, and Iran responded.

    As if we would not do the exact same thing if roles were reversed...

    Black and white "evil" "good" thinkers are so freaking dense...

    In the neoklans world, anyone in their estimation wrong makes their wrong right...as they life on the hard edge of constant rationalization of doing pretty much what the "evil doers" do, but claim they are righteous in doing so...

    Two wrongs don't make it right.

     
  9. "Whatever."

    That comment pretty much sums up the extent and depth of your thought process...when challenged on your fallacious thinking.

    The rest is red herring/strawman rationalization crap...


     
  10. Cool, I'm glad to hear you support the objectives of the Democrat's in Iran.

     
    #10     Apr 3, 2007