Of course you don't, someone hacked your ET id and posted this https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...bal-warming-is-fabricated-study-finds.311099/
As carefully explained before I have only posted links from Breitbart under half a dozen times on ET. I have obviously posted links to sources such as CNN, WP, etc. far more many times than Brietbart. In the instance above I posted the Breitbart article since it provided some context and provided links to the paper & other related information. This allows people to go read the resources and take a look at the facts. But, of course, all of this was explained to full detail before --- so basically you are just being a Twit.
And that means you don't follow them. The problem with you right wingers is that you guys constantly try to render language meaningless but have the highest of standards for absolutely anyone who is not a cultist. NYT is 'fake news' but Breitbart is worth quoting half a dozen times and not to mention the 'paper' you linked to doesn't exist - it's some random made up 'paper' that is not even acknowledged by the writers on their own sites. Nice try.
Calling NYT fake news while linking breitbart half a dozen times just shoots down your credibility and makes you a mockery.
NYT is fake news because once every six months they issue a correction which ofcourse isn't right wing style - right wingers peddle complete BS and then play victim by pretending nothing happened.
Decades ago the New York Times was a news source with leading journalistic integrity. Sadly they have continued to sink to new lows as story after story over recent years have been uncovered as complete fabrications driven by the reporters' political agenda rather than the facts.
Whatever they printed this past week which will be revealed to be less than factual.... a continual repeating cycle.