ok, still waiting for verification of the above statement. unfortunately, your perfect posted track OR observing you "trade" in a seminar environment does not qualify. please stick to the topic at hand, personal attacks only indicate the weakness of your position. thanks, surf
You want discredit. I'll let the facts speak for themselves. Your opinions are as validated above . . . worthless.
You were offered the data to evaluate and refused for whatever obscure reason. Probably because it was over your head.
I don't believe this is true. However, I will give you the benefit of the doubt-- once again: please post this data for evaluation by the erudite members of elite trader. regards, surf
marketsurfer Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 7769 11-07-06 02:59 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote from steve46: Now if you read back in this thread, you will come to the post where Marketsurfer "pronounces" his verdict that Hsu & Kuan were "discredited"..Bullshit.. They did good work and reported it in a scholarly way..What I did was learn from them and put the results to work. I get a concrete return for my hard work on a daily basis. Hope this helps someone out there. Steve -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- many of your posts on this thread actually appear civil and erudite. however, i must clarify your statement above--- i stated that "some" of hsu&kuan's "research" has been discredited. i did not state that they were discredited. this is a very important distinction. regards, surf LivermoresGhost Registered: Jul 2004 Posts: 179 11-07-06 03:05 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote from marketsurfer: many of your posts on this thread actually appear civil and erudite. however, i must clarify your statement above--- i stated that "some" of hsu&kuan's "research" has been discredited. i did not state that they were discredited. this is a very important distinction. regards, surf -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- surf, you are right. Freudian slip. LG responds to Surfer's post for steve? Say whaaaaa?
what does my CV have to do with your claims and the topic of this thread? here is a hint for you---try your searching using "dave". your claims of "perfection" speak for themselves for anyone but the newest of traders-- do you know the difference between a crank and a charlatan? LOL ! surf
David, your publisher and editor really fucked up. The footnotes in the Introduction starting on Page 7 are all off by one. For example, Footnote 18 about random vs. actual price charts is actually number 17 on page 478, and then all the ones after that mismatch. Make sure you self-publish your next book because you could do a lot better than these idiots. Their sloppy job is a disservice to your work and makes the book harder to read and validate.
I stand corrected . . . Tradingmarkets.com has eight matches for articles under Dave Goodboy. The other sites still find no matches. This on top of the other presumable embellishments. My research is mine. I trade it and who cares. I never mentioned how I trade. Do I intimidate you that much? Before you started your typical attack this was a pretty decent thread but as usual when the conversation turns to material or information you cannot comprehend or understand you go on the attack. Instead of trying to understand an idea you try to destroy it. How typical for such a small minded little man.
the "other" sites? i own/owned/worked with/ or operated the other sites, what on earth are you talking about? let me give you another hint--try google with parenthesis----- You can't defend your positions so you turn to personal libel--how typical and weak. let's keep this thread on topic, shall we? surf
Hi You are correct. This error was spotted about 2 weeks before the publication date too late to do anything about it. And in the end it was my fault. The notes do get back in gear by #19 I think and the error has been noted to the publisher and will be corrected if they go into a second printing. Good spot though. Thanks David Aronson