The best hedge fund ever?

Discussion in 'Trading' started by Maverick74, Jul 7, 2007.

  1. #21     Jul 7, 2007
  2. 100% fraudulent.

    $75 for a 30% return?

    I'll pay $75,000 for a 30% return , if it actually returned.
     
    #22     Jul 7, 2007
  3. Aaron

    Aaron

    Hey, thank you! I was hoping I wasn't the only one who noticed!

    Aaron Schindler
    Schindler Trading
     
    #23     Jul 7, 2007
  4. mahras2

    mahras2

    seems to be like a leveraged trend following fund. don't see anything impressive here. That is IF they are even legit.
     
    #24     Jul 7, 2007
  5. What, did they start with uncle Morrie's 38k pension fund?
     
    #25     Jul 7, 2007
  6. I assume that the managed account is a commission model, not a 2/20 arrangement. I've seen some of these retail systems in which "managed account" simply means a hefty retail commission is paid on each transaction.
     
    #26     Jul 7, 2007
  7. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    It's actually a 0/25 model. No management fees and 25% profit incentive per IASG.

    This is a quote from their IASG profile.

    "We do not charge a management fee as we believe all fees should be performance based; you only pay for our skills, when you win."
     
    #27     Jul 7, 2007
  8. mahras2

    mahras2

    Hehhhh...

    88%+ standard dev of returns

    Lets just say this guy isn't any jim simmons.
     
    #28     Jul 7, 2007
  9. Who is?
     
    #29     Jul 7, 2007
  10. That would be the FSA. And no, not registered. Check it
    yourself:

    http://www.fsa.gov.uk/Pages/register/

    The fastest way to a stellar track record is to make it up.
    By whom are TrendInvestor's numbers audited? IASG's
    numbers are self-reported by the firms listed.

    This is a scam at a likelihood of over 90%, the clues are
    all over the website -- cheesy and unprofessional design,
    spelling and grammatical errors, selling a world beating
    system retail for peanuts....

    And I don't care if the word "trend" is in the name or
    not, twelve years of 100% returns and you would have
    investors lined up, you wouldn't be selling your signals,
    issuing bogus challenges, and writing articles for "major
    financial websites" like GoldEagle.com!

    Also, the numbers don't add up -- sample variance ratio
    (monthly/yearly) matches no distribution ever generated
    by the markets. Try resampling the monthlies and you'll
    see what I mean.

    I know you are a respected member of this board, but
    the position you are taking here is nonsensical. Is this
    some kind of prank on your part?
     
    #30     Jul 8, 2007