The bears were wrong

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by Kicking, Jan 11, 2006.

  1. And International Paper (IP), AT&T (T) and Eastman Kodak (EK); three other important stocks which were kicked out when they didn't fit anymore!

    PS: Thanks for your friendly words plugger.
     
    #51     Jan 21, 2006
  2. And I wouldn't be surprised if General Motors (GM) is the next one who has to leave the troupe.
     
    #52     Jan 21, 2006
  3. Did you actually short VTSS at $97 all the way down to $2.20 ? Did you short all the others down to their lows ? Did you even make 50% on 50% of your shorts? It's easy to pick the best examples and say look it went down from 100 to 2! Obviously if you do not even know that you only get a handful of low risk shorting opportunities ( more like 2-3 setups)during a stock decline you must not be a very skillfull short seller.

    Anyway I am tired of replying as far as I am concerned I think I will close this thread here.
     
    #53     Jan 21, 2006
  4. DHOHHI

    DHOHHI

    You don't need to catch all the move of a stock, either UP or DOWN! Yes, I shorted VTSS at $97. And I covered higher than the current $2.20 price. So what? Bottom line is I did quite well. Same with the others listed. No I didn't short them to the lows. Do you hold all your long positions to the high and then sell at the very top? Doubtful. Most traders, or at least those I know, are looking to just catch a big part of a move, whether short term (intra-day) or longer term (months or years). No one can short (or go long) at the top (or bottom) and then cover (or sell) at the bottom (or top).

    But, it's easier to close the thread I suppose when someone else presents an opposing viewpoint, factually based.

    Bottom line is that one can make money shorting stocks every day, just as they can make money on the long side.
     
    #54     Jan 22, 2006
  5. are we really taking advice from a trader who had to trade from the university because he could not afford his own computer and who used an online broker that needed 5m to execute an order ?
    Really impressed. And because a short trade went against you you have been convinced since then that long is any better ?

    In a shorter time frame and with proper money management there is no difference between short or long.

    Believe me, the people having short positions Friday really enjoyed a nice day. And there are more to come...
     
    #55     Jan 22, 2006
  6. ahaha I just knew someone would say that. The Uni computer room is where I first got interested in online trading. I can see what sort of trader you must be, thinks he needs all the bells and whistles to make money.

    Well for me this thread was more of a monoloque than anything else, I did not really expect any positive contribution from ET members, the decreasing minority of decent and interesting ET contributors would have nothing to add to what I said and the very few truly skillful and succesful at shorting stocks would not bother telling the world how they do it.

    I thank all the clueless shorts for all the great long opportunities they provide




    yeah but they got killed a hundred times since 2003
     
    #56     Jan 22, 2006
  7. The U.S. equities market does have an upward bias over very long time frames. It is so slight, however, that I wonder whether it has any practical value for traders.
     
    #57     Jan 22, 2006
  8. DHOHHI

    DHOHHI

    No, traders don't need ALL the bells and whistles. But anyone who trades through an online broker and has to wait 5 minutes for a confirmation is trading in the dark ages. There are a number of direct access brokers that are as cheap, if not cheaper than online brokers, where you get INSTANT confirmations.

    No positive contributions? Huh ... I'm guessing you're not a trader, or not a full time trader. I've had some of my best shorting days when the market was up 100-200 points. And I've had some great long days when the market was tanking. How and why? Intra-day trades are plentiful on the big move days. When panic sets in you go long for a quick trade. And when the market is tunning wildly you play a few shorts, since a pullback often occurs. And when one has longer term shorts (or longs) where you're up 10-20% you're in no hurry to cover (or sell longs). I make more of my money on position trades but each and every day there are a LOT of short plays.

    Maybe the Steelers will just run the ball today. I mean why throw it? There's more chance of "problems" (i.e. interceptions) so it's a lower probability option. That's how you seem to view the long/short options in trading. Yeah, let's just use 1/2 of our options.
     
    #58     Jan 22, 2006
  9. It would appear that the mere timing alone of this thread would warrant serious consideration for The Donkey Award. However, the committee has decided that the near constant rebuttals provided by "Kicking" have nearly sealed his fate.

    Therefore, the Donkey Award for the month of January, 2006 is hereby presented to Kicking. He has exhibited a marvelous combination of hubris, ignorance and disdain, all traits that are shared by past winners of this dubious distinction.
     
    #59     Jan 22, 2006
  10. zdreg

    zdreg

    let us all know when the clueless bears are dead or have gone into hibernation.
     
    #60     Jan 23, 2006