Donald Trump was recorded in telling his supporters to vote twice... We all know who in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election was encouraging his supporters to vote twice. He then tried to walk back his commentary by clarifying at a later date what he really meant. Then he went to another state and repeated the same bullshit to his supporters. The prior Arizona Audits since the 2020 Presidential Elections...the discrepancies were mainly on the Republican side and I wouldn't be surprise if such is found again by the current audit considering Trump supporters are not the sharpest tool in the shed...they did exactly what President Trump asked them to do...vote twice. wrbtrader
Judge rules that donors to Arizona's election fraudit don't get to remain anonymous... Arizona Audit’s Fundraising Docs Are Public Records, Judge Says https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/arizona-audits-fundraising-docs-are-public-records-judge-says An Arizona judge on Thursday denied Republican senators’ motion to dismiss a lawsuit seeking records on the financial backers and other aspects of the sham “audit” of the 2020 elections in Maricopa County. “It is difficult to conceive of a case with a more compelling public interest demanding public disclosure and public scrutiny,” Judge Michael W. Kemp wrote at the end of a seven-page decision. The ruling, in favor of a lawsuit for records from the left-leaning watchdog group American Oversight, gets the public one step closer to learning behind-the-scenes details of the audit, including who’s funding it. The audit was authorized by state Senate President Karen Fann (R) and has been performed by third-party vendors led by Cyber Ninjas, a tech firm with no elections experience prior to the 2020 elections. The firm’s CEO, Doug Logan, posted crazy conspiracy theories about that election before being hired for the audit. The Senate paid its contractors $150,000 for their audit work — but that’s only a fraction of the expense. Private fundraisers — Trump supporters who see the audit as the “first domino” in a long line of investigations that will vindicate Trump’s lies about election fraud — rushed to fill the void. Kemp said Thursday that records in those contractors’ possession were subject to Arizona’s public records law where they had a “substantial nexus” with a government agency’s activities. He rejected the argument that Cyber Ninjas and other private vendors working on the audit were exempt from public records laws. Allowing the Senate to circumvent public records law by retaining private companies would be “an absurd result,” he said. “The ‘substantial nexus’ standard narrows the scope of the inquiry,” the judge wrote. “Records concerning how the audit was planned and conducted, the identity of third-parties subsidizing the audit, and the source and specifics of the audit procedures are matters of public record subject to disclosure under the [public records law].” He separately wrote that the the amounts paid by the audit’s funders were also subject to public records law: “[A]ll records disclosing specifically who is paying for and financing this legislative activity as well as precisely how much is being paid are subject to the PRL.” Despite auditors’ claims that the review has been “transparent,” the audit’s funding has been a months-long mystery, though some funders have publicly announced their support. Christina Bobb, the One America News anchor reporting on the audit for the far-right network, has advertised her fundraising group for the audit, Voices and Votes, on air. Lin Wood, the QAnon-promoting pro-Trump lawyer who faces potential legal penalties for his own post-election actions, told TPM his organization Fight Back donated $50,000 to Bobb’s group. Wood also said Logan had been present at his South Carolina property last year investigating the election. Perhaps the largest source of fundraising has been ex-Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne’s group The America Project, which fundraised through a website called Fund The Audit. Logan recently appeared in a documentary starring Byrne, which was given access to the audit’s counting floor and ballot boxes. The filing Thursday is separate from another suit pursuing audit records, from The Arizona Republic. The House Oversight Committee also recently wrote to Logan requesting documents.
on what grounds? SCOTUS set precedent on CA anonymous donor rules like 2 wks ago. This will be struck down.
Funding of campaigns or PACs in regards to disclosure of donors is different then funding a public activity such as government operations or anything related to election results. If donors fund a public art display then the identities of the donors must be disclosed - Similar to funding any type of election results evaluation which typically has public oversight (and funding) from election boards and involves using public resources such as the ballots, voting machines, and the recount location.
source? The SCOTUS ruling was not explicitly dealing w/PACs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Prosperity_Foundation_v._Bonta
Go donate anything to a public government or public university.... and see if you can remain anonymous. Public records disclosing the donors are a requirement for accepting any donation.
They are using public resources and public materials --- hence the funding plus donors is a public record.