The military has a way to weed out those types of idiots that fight like hell to whitewash the history of America... I saw it first hand myself when I was in the Armed Forces as an officer. In fact, most military officers eagerly learn about the history and the history of governments to better be able to defend against it. To #whitewash it...makes the United States vulnerable to outside threads and domestic threats...to many people intentionally forget the Timothy McVeigh / Oklahoma Bombing...a domestic terrorist that if alive today...would fit into the Qanon beliefs and the insurrection on the United States capitol. He had a known racist background in the military and he was then encourage to try to become a Special Force after serving well in Operation Desert Storm. He just didn't know the military wanted to weed him out and decided to wash him out of the program...ending his brief military career. wrbtrader
Stop your nonsense---he said nothing of the sort. This is what pro-Americans are up against now-----lies and misinformation----Goebbels would be proud of GWB and ilk.
BOMBSHELL: California Has 1.8M More Registered Voters Than it Should https://californiaglobe.com/section...s-1-8m-more-registered-voters-than-it-should/ Why are there almost 124,000 more votes counted in California’s November 3, 2020 election than voters recorded as voting in that election? And why is most of the discrepancy driven by 116,000 vote-by-mail ballots with no apparent voter identified in VoteCal’s voting histories? Click here for a list by county. Why do more than 7,700 voters have TWO November 3, 2020 votes credited to their voting histories? These are two votes credited to each of 7,700 unique (non-duplicated) registration ID numbers in the state database. This indicates mass double voting, a significant programming error in the state’s registration system, or both. Why does California have 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible citizens and why did this overage rise 72% in the 2020 election cycle?
1.The Election Integrity Project is not a non nonpartisan organization as your source claims,its a conservative organization. 2.A Federal Judge just threw out one of their recent bull shit lawsuits. https://www.mercurynews.com/2021/06...t-that-echoed-trump-claims-of-election-fraud/ A federal judge on Tuesday dismissed with prejudice a lawsuit filed by California Republicans that echoed false allegations made by former President Donald Trump about the validity of the 2020 election. The lawsuit, filed in January by a conservative election watchdog group and 10 failed GOP congressional candidates against a slew of state and county elections officials, claimed the November election in California was rife with “mass irregularities and opportunities for fraud.” The plaintiffs argued that such conditions have been brewing in California for years, but were exacerbated by changes made last year to make sure all voters in the state had access to a ballot during the COVID-19 pandemic. But those arguments, similar to claims made in dozens of other lawsuits disputing the 2020 election, were rejected. Federal Judge Andre Birotte wrote in a 13-page ruling published Tuesday that the plaintiffs didn’t offer concrete evidence that problems affected the outcome of California’s November elections. Birotte also said he agreed with the defendants’ statement that the lawsuit amounted to “an incremental undermining of confidence in the election results, past and future.” Defendants in the case — including officials who run elections in many California counties — welcomed the ruling and Birotte’s reasoning for the decision. “I think the judge is concurring with what we certainly have known all along, and that is that this election was done with the most intense scrutiny I’ve ever faced,” said Neal Kelley, who has been Orange County’s Registrar of Voters for 18 years and was one of 13 county registrars named as defendants in the suit. “All of the audits and checks and balances we have in place showed that the will of the voters was carried out,” Kelley added. The case claimed that by sending vote-by-mail ballots to every registered voter, California opened the door to fraudulent voting. (Before the emergency orders, around 75% of California voters, and all registered voters in Orange County, already received vote-by-mail ballots.) The suit also repeated unfounded claims launched by Trump’s personal lawyers about the use of Dominion voting systems and about election observers not being able to get close enough to the ballot-counting process to see what was happening. Similar claims have been made in roughly 100 cases filed across the country since November. More than 60 of those cases have failed. The Brennan Center for Justice’s Voting Rights Litigation Tracker says 33 such cases are still pending in 13 states plus Washington, D.C., but this is the last case Brennan Center has been tracking in California. The California suit was filed Jan. 4 in the Central District court in Los Angeles by Election Integrity Project California, a nonprofit watchdog group that’s tied to the conservative Public Law Foundation. The nonprofit fights for stricter voter control measures and sends people to observe how ballots are handled on Election Day. Also backing the suit were 10 candidates who ran for congress in California in 2020 and lost, including Greg Raths of Mission Viejo, James Bradley of Laguna Niguel, Aja Smith of Moreno Valley, Eric Early of Los Angeles, Alison Hayden of Hayward, Jeffrey Gorman of Santa Cruz, Mark Reed of Sunland, Buzz Patterson of Sacramento, Mike Cargile of Pomona and Kevin Cookingham of Clovis. The group filed the suit against three state officials: Gov. Gavin Newsom, former Secretary of State Alex Padilla and former Attorney General Xavier Becerra. They also sued 13 county registrars who cover districts touched by the failed congressional candidates, including elections officials for Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. The original claim asked the judge to decertify the results of the November election. But the plaintiffs later dropped that request in an amended complaint, though they still sought an audit of paper ballots (similar to the controversial third-party audit now underway in Arizona) and a repeal of emergency orders that sent ballots to all registered voters. The 44-page suit contains no specific claims about ballots falsely counted or harm done to any particular candidate. Instead, the plaintiffs argued that votes could have been diluted because of the potential for invalid votes to be counted. They cite anecdotal reports, for example, that ballots were left unattended and that validation of signatures on vote-by-mail ballots “was either not done or done so quickly that it could not have been effective.” (Of the nearly 18 million ballots Californians cast in the November election, nearly 50,000 were rejected because a signature did not match.) In response to the suit, attorneys for state and county officials said the allegations of election irregularities and potential fraud “amount to little more than a list of scattershot idiosyncrasies in the elections process.” Instead, they argued, the real goal of the suit is “to make it harder for Californians to vote.” Defendants’ attorneys also noted that the plaintiffs waited two months after the election to file suit, though some of the election laws they complain about have in place for months or even years. With winners already seated in office, the response to the suit states, “Plaintiffs — comprised of a nonprofit corporation and unsuccessful California congressional candidates who allegedly plan to run for election in 2022 — now seek to nullify the will of the people of California.” The defense further argued that the plaintiffs were “casting doubt upon the results of the past election and seeking to reverse decades of efforts in California to expand access to the ballot box,” pointing out that the the allegations echoed claims about “fraud and irregularities… that have been debunked and rejected by state and federal courts across the country.” The defendants’ response notes that “more than 680,000 fraudulent votes would have to have been counted in order for the election outcome to have been changed for all Plaintiffs.” Their margins of defeat ranged from 28,747 votes, in Raths’ loss to Democrat Katie Porter of Irvine, to 165,238 votes, in Gorman’s loss to Democrat Jimmy Panetta of Carmel Valley. “For such massive election fraud to go unchecked, myriad election officials, their staff and volunteers, and government leaders would need to be active, willing participants,” the response to the suit notes. “Notably, Plaintiffs have not identified any such evidence of a scheme — because none existed.” In his 18 years as registrar, overseeing about 15 million ballots, Kelley said, “I’ve never seen evidence of any sort of widespread or large-scale fraud. And this is something we look at daily. We’re always looking for anomalies. It’s a constant process.” Kelley said he welcomes conversation about how to continue to make the voting process more secure and transparent. But he said he hopes Californians will go through the established channels to observe post-election processes and approach the legislature about requested changes rather than trying to change the outcome of an election in court. Rick Hasen, a professor at UC Irvine who specializes in election law, said he reviewed the case a few weeks ago and found it “weak both factually and legally, and so I’m not surprised it has not gone anywhere.” But Republicans apparently have been using the case to drum up attention for candidates running for office in 2022. The Republican Party of Orange County, for example, in May promoted an event where Raths promised to give an update on the lawsuit. Raths is running for Board of Supervisors next year. He didn’t respond to a request to speak for this story. Attorneys for the plaintiffs and several other congressional candidates who filed the suit also didn’t respond to requests to discuss the judge’s ruling.
Newsflash,not many take your bull shit seriously.How did all of you previous bull shit posts like this work out?
Let's meet one of the promoters of the Arizona "Audit". Added bonus - she is an Oath Keeper member and support other violent groups which invaded the Capital. Arizona state senator touts appearance on network that warned against ‘Jewish tyrants’ https://forward.com/fast-forward/47...ts-appearance-on-network-that-warned-against/ Arizona state Sen. Wendy Rogers, a Republican, appeared on an antisemitic online TV network last week to promote the state’s baseless 2020 election audit. The appearance, originally reported by a Twitter account called AZ Right Wing Watch and later covered by the left-leaning watchdog Media Matters, featured Rogers in an interview with the white nationalist Lauren Witzke and a co-host, Edward Szall on TruNews. That network is infamous for a segment about a “Jew coup” against former president Donald Trump, claims that “seditious Jews” were behind the impeachment process and most recently, a statement from the platform’s founder that “the American people are being oppressed by Jewish tyrants.” Rogers, who represents Arizona’s sixth district in the state senate, which includes Flagstaff, went on the program to discuss the weeks-long review of 2.1 million votes in Arizona’s Maricopa County, which President Joe Biden won by more than 45,000 votes. A Phoenix judge threw out an early effort to audit a larger share of ballots in the county, and Scott Jarrett, the county’s director of election day and emergency voting, said last November that Republicans and Democrats who tested the ballots “themselves found zero variance” in the results. The Trump White House came under fire in early 2020 for granting TruNews press credentials for Trump’s trip to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. The then-president also took a question from a TruNews reporter in 2018 during a press conference and Donald Trump Jr. interviewed with TruNews in 2019. TruNews was formally rebuked by two members of Congress in 2019 after the network’s host, Pastor Rick Wiles, said that “when Jews take over a country,” “they kill millions of Christians.” Rogers, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment, has said she is a member of the Oath Keepers, a far-right militia group that showed up in force at the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection. The June 18 TruNews appearance was highlighted on Rogers’ website, with an invitation to “Watch her appearance below.”