Just so everyone knows----There is no such thing as fake electors. Congreff either accepts or rejects slates of electors. ---Nothing illegal there.
The number of people who were convicted of crimes or whose lives went straight down the tubes because of Trump must now run into the thousands. and yet he still collects money from yall.
"There is no such thing as fake electors"? Let's ask these fake electors in Michigan who have just been indicted about this. Can people really be this stupid? https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...an-ag-in-alleged-2020-election-scheme.375377/
Maybe they don't really exist. Maybe they're just "crisis actors." Because, like, you know, that's a thing. Right?
https://www.hawaiifreepress.com/Art...-Hawaii-Sends-Two-Slates-to-Electoral-College Hawaii was a new state in 1960 holding its first presidential election — a concept that’s also worth remembering as the possibility of adding Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia to the union is portrayed as somehow outrageous. Turnout topped 93 percent in Hawaii. The state’s result was close, just as the nation’s was overall. Nixon initially appeared to be the winner by 141 votes, and the Republican governor declared him the winner. But a judge granted the Kennedy team’s request for a recount. As it dragged on, the judge rejected GOP attempts to stop the count. When the mid-December date came for the Electoral College to meet — this year it’s Dec. 14 — both Republican and Democratic electors sent their votes to Washington to be counted. Kennedy eventually was declared the winner in the Hawaii recount by 115 votes, but the two sets of certifications were waiting when the joint session of Congress convened. Democrats, including Rep. Daniel K. Inouye, were ready to lodge an objection if the GOP slate was counted, but the presiding officer — the Senate president, who also is the vice president: i.e., Nixon — pushed the issue aside. “He resolved it in a rather statesmanlike way by using parliamentary procedure,” State University of New York professor James A. Gardner said in a recent webinar organized by the New York State Bar Association. “He asked for unanimous consent that the votes of the Democratic electors would count. So he resolved this against himself.” …
You have got to be a clown to confuse a situation where a formal court decision by a judge states that two panels of electors will be provided while results are pending... with a situation where a group of clowns unilaterally decide that they are "electors" and send in false paperwork proclaiming themselves as "electors".
That "independent, non-partisan" ballot audit the AZ Senate hired the Cyber-Ninjas to perform? New emails show that Rudy Giuliani and others in Trump's orbit "seeded" the volunteer pool with their own people. And they STILL failed to find anything. Rudy Giuliani may have assigned volunteer to Arizona 'audit', new emails show https://news.yahoo.com/rudy-giuliani-may-assigned-volunteer-130056423.html
I'm not surprised that a state attorney general doesn't understand how The Constitution and Federal statutes work. Congreff either accepts or rejects slates of electors-----no one else has that authority.