The ACD Method

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by sbrowne126, Jul 16, 2009.

  1. I am not saying you are using other indicators, if I gave that impression, I apologise. That was meant for others who have posted recently.

    My point is if you want to trade intraday and find levels, TPO Market Profile is far superior to assorted ORs. You will get true levels that are not too far from Volume Profile levels. I spent months studying both, the difference is less than 5%, maybe significant for day trading, irrelevant for longer term.

    I mention volume because it is not available in FX, which I trade, but many here don't trade FX and if their instruments have volume, then Volume Profile is preferable to TPO.

    I'm implying you don't want to do work because in response to two links I provided, you referred to the volume bars below you chart. Market Profile is on a different planet.
     
    #12801     Jan 27, 2017
    Apollonius likes this.
  2. No need to apologise. I am an idiot and say a lot of stupid stuff, I just was puzzled. Thanks for the info and I will look into it when I get home.
     
    #12802     Jan 27, 2017
  3. koolaid

    koolaid

  4. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Sure. Losing money day after day eventually gets people to stop doing it. The fact of the matter is, this market is not moving up enough to stay long and hedged at the same time. It produces zero return. Being short leads only to losses. It's the hot pan theory. How many times are you going to grab it and say "ouch" before you stop doing it. Markets are adaptive. It learns from it's previous mistakes. Right now historical vol in the SPX is near the 6 handle. That implies a forward return of about 3% using a historical .50 sharpe as our benchmark. At 3%, there is no room to hedge without creating a negative expected return.
     
    #12804     Jan 28, 2017
    .sigma, wow12, Apollonius and 3 others like this.
  5. koolaid

    koolaid

    If I am understanding this correctly...SPY is not moving up enough to pay for the premiums of these bear hedges....so people are abandoning their hedges...which should bring about more volatility?
     
    #12805     Jan 28, 2017
  6. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Yup, you got it. And yes, it "should" bring about more volatility. The problem I keep seeing is that this market is so one sided in it's thinking. Everyone was sure Trump was going to lose. Then, if Trump won, everyone was so sure the market was going to tank 10% which never happened. Then everyone was so sure we would dip right after the new year since there was a strong benefit to hold capital gains into the next year. Then everyone was so sure we would sell on the inauguration. Now everyone and their in laws are saying Feb is the month. EVERYONE wants to the market to go down including people who are already long. Because they are not long enough. The bears obviously want it to go down. And all the people sitting in cash want a long entry. Nobody wants the market to go higher and so that is what it's doing. LOL.
     
    #12806     Jan 29, 2017
    tommcginnis likes this.
  7. Ralph Vince also talks of a similar scenario in this link.
     
    #12807     Feb 2, 2017
  8. Maverick, what your thought on the 2&10 and how this relates to overall earnings and related NPV of money w/ rates moving higher?

    Does Renaissance Medallion fund use ACD ?
     
    #12808     Feb 2, 2017
  9. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    I'm long the 2/10. I like it a lot. As long as the Fed stays behind the curve this will keep steepening. This will be accreative to bank earnings.
     
    #12809     Feb 2, 2017
    redbaron1981 likes this.
  10. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    #12810     Feb 2, 2017
    wow12 likes this.