The ACD Method

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by sbrowne126, Jul 16, 2009.

  1. rt5909

    rt5909

    I actively trade both....and use shorter term NLs

    Keep an eye on rb structure.... Everybody wants to short this pop in crude....I'm not sure that'll work....structure of rbob breaking down considerably though.... Products will be the gauge of the market going forward...just my opinion
     
    #11361     Mar 21, 2016
  2. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    ISEE 54.....Come on ET, stop trying to fade this. :)
     
    #11362     Mar 22, 2016
    kinggyppo likes this.
  3. Shush Mav, I am sure the top can't be that far away :)
     
    #11363     Mar 22, 2016
  4. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Oh, it's always within reach. :)
     
    #11364     Mar 22, 2016
  5. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    For whatever this is worth, I am really struggling to find new decent longs in stocks. And my internal ACD breadth which covers 2500 stocks is at really wide extremes. Just sayin...
     
    #11365     Mar 22, 2016
    kinggyppo and FCXoptions like this.
  6. DT3

    DT3

    Can we stick a fork in gold yet?
     
    #11366     Mar 23, 2016
  7. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    The 30 day NL is around zero so choppy number line. Failed monthly A up and now approaching monthly A down. Still above QTR A up. But we get new levels in a week or so. Nothing to do here.
     
    #11367     Mar 23, 2016
  8. koolaid

    koolaid

    So it's also bad if the NL stays too positive or negative for too long? Do you fade NLs as one of your strategies or have you tested that?
     
    #11368     Mar 23, 2016
  9. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    No, don't fade them. LOL. I'm referring to the % that are confirmed.
     
    #11369     Mar 23, 2016
  10. SteveM

    SteveM

    Mav may have a different opinion, but in my experience with extreme NLs, context is important.

    In Fisher's book he says "when a numberline reading goes from 0 to +/-9, and trades at +/-9 for two cosecutive trading sessions, there is a good chance that a big move in the underlying instrument could be underway".

    In regards to context, I wouldn't want to open an initial short position on a stock if it had continuous readings of <-20 AND the broad stock market was also deeply negative (think oil stocks in mid January). However, I would be really interested in a stock if it had continuous numberline values >20 DESPITE the broad market being deeply negative (think gold mining stocks, or NDLS in mid January). Stocks whose numberlines diverge deeply from what the board indices are doing are great because because when the broader indices turn they really take off.

    If you can find a stock today that has a deeply negative numberline despite that market's strength over the last month, then chances are that stock is very sick and will fall further when the indices turn down.

    This is just my opinion, but a big part of successfully being able to deal with the ebbs and flows of a position one is in, is the get into the position as close to the beginning of the move as possible. If I take a short position on an oil driller after its fallen 70% this month when the broad market is down 15%, the potential for a big retracement is much greater than if I'm short when the numberline went quickly from 0 to -9 and the stock has only fallen 10%.

    Just my two cents.
     
    #11370     Mar 23, 2016