The ACD Method

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by sbrowne126, Jul 16, 2009.

  1. eurusdzn

    eurusdzn

    Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, China, India, Russia, Brazil all down -3% to -7% today
    and all in bear markets. Since October the SPY/EEM , talked about in ACD, continues to trend well.
     
    #10821     Jan 15, 2016
    wow12 likes this.
  2. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    I forgot about the SPY/EEM spread. That baby is on fire now!
     
    #10822     Jan 15, 2016
    wow12 and redbaron1981 like this.
  3. jj90

    jj90

    Treasuries(TLT) should be stronger into this selloff, something's not right here....

    Looking like we could see another 5-10% downside fast on SPY or imminent rally.
     
    #10823     Jan 16, 2016
  4. Since I started trading options a couple of years ago, I've subscribed to McMillan's free weekly newsletter. He has always mentioned the CBOE Equity only Put/Call Ratio as something he tracks, so I subscribe to that from the CBOE, also free. In all this time it has usually been in the 0.50-0.60 range, give or take.

    Yesterday it closed at 1.14. This is the first time I've seen it so high, so I can't tell you what comes next as I'm about to find out myself. Time permitting I might see if CBOE provides free access to historical data and have a look.

    This is what McMillan said about it in yesterday's weekly newsletter;

    "Equity-only put-call ratios continue to rise, and thus they remain on sell signals. There will not be a buy signal until they peak and roll over."
     
    #10824     Jan 16, 2016
  5. sarue

    sarue

    My Quarterly A down was hit and held Friday for the Naz and RUT. I also had successful tests on Banks, Biotech, Semis and Miners. The S&P and Dow are just a little lower. I didn't buy these tests ahead of a long weekend but will watch to see if we've come down far enough for at least a decent bounce early this coming week.
     
    #10825     Jan 16, 2016
  6. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    I like to normalize the data. In other words, in my opinion, using these indicators is worthless if you also don't assess value. For example, the fact that people are buying puts tells me nothing especially if those puts represent value, they are actually good trades. It's when you have high put/call ratios or inversely low ISEE values AND high option premiums that matter. In other words, you have a disproportionate amount of people "overpaying" for vol and vice versa on the upside. Right now vol is still too cheap so the readings are meaningless.
     
    #10826     Jan 16, 2016
  7. koolaid

    koolaid

    How do you measure if vol is cheap or not? Do you just look at implied vol when measuring if options are cheap vs expensive?
     
    #10827     Jan 16, 2016
  8. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    Just look at what you are paying for realized Vol. If you can buy a straddle for 100 handles and the ES is moving 100 handles every two days, that's pretty cheap. A 30 day straddle pays for itself in two trading sessions.
     
    #10828     Jan 16, 2016
  9. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    BTW, here is an overlay of the 1998 Asian crisis vs the current one although the assumption here is that the move in August down was the corresponding corrective pattern and the recent move to the new highs was similar to the peak in 2000.

    [​IMG]

    The only thing I'll say to that is being that this is the 2nd longest bull market in world history, I expect the grand finale to be a little more exciting then the re-testing of the highs we made in the 4th qtr. Although I see they are just marking the return from the swing low to the end of year high and not the ultimate high in 2000.
     
    #10829     Jan 16, 2016
  10. koolaid

    koolaid

    Thanks Mav,

    One last question for the day...lol...I think you have touched on this somewhere in the past. How do you account for the NL when you have gap downs and gap ups before open like we had in SPY this past week?
     
    #10830     Jan 16, 2016