You try and pull your prove it move a lot and every time its proved. But Trump just said he didn't know anything about releasing Tate? And you just want to piss on people's shoes and tell them it's raining some more. Sure, while we are being just utter morons, we shall just take than kind of Israel's word. Not like their senior leadership blatantly allowed the Hamas attack to unfold, the day after the 50th anniversary of the last time they pulled the same type of trick. Bibi would remember that as as a young man he was called back for military duties from his studies on America. The Hamas attack on Israel occurred on October 7, 2023, which was one day after the 50th anniversary of the start of the Yom Kippur War on October 6, 1973 Israel deliberately allowed the Yom Kippur War (1973) to unfold to some extent in order to secure a strategic and political advantage. The idea is that Israeli intelligence had strong indications of an impending attack by Egypt and Syria but allowed the initial assault to happen so that Israel could later justify a massive counterattack and territorial gains. But hey, binary moral thinking is comforting to low effort minds.
? Don't blame me if you don't have evidence of your claims. Dude, you're hopping all over here. Are we back to the current topic again? This isn't Israel's word, this is following the funding. That's why the hearing was there. Yeah, none of this has anything to do with us sending money directly to Hamas and Hezbollah.
The faux-detached skepticism, the constant demands for "proof" while ignoring inconvenient evidence and past form, is exactly what pretty stupid people think sage intelligence looks like. It’s not wisdom, just a performance of it for people who don’t know better. But hey, be startled that this is not edited into the prior post why don't you?
LOL...constant demands for proof. Yeah, how dare I ask you to back up your statements with evidence! Nothing about you startles me, other than each successive post making new lows in obtuseness. If you say Trump arranged for the Tate brothers to be released, but can't show proof of this, then that's a problem, dude. Even if you don't want to admit it.
Tsingy, you keep pretending the issue is simply "asking for proof," but that’s not the problem. The problem is how you ignore past patterns of behavior, dismiss inconvenient evidence, and pretend each event happens in a vacuum. It’s not skepticism, it’s just bad faith denialism. Also, if you really think "prove it" is some genius move, you should at least be consistent. You’ll demand airtight evidence for anything you dislike but swallow obvious nonsense when it suits you. This isn’t a court, and you’re not a judge deciding what’s admissible. If you were, you wouldn’t have a moment to spare from correcting Team Evil here.
I don't dismiss evidence, that's the pothole you continue to step in. You don't have evidence for your claims. When you do, I'll accept it. Again, please show where solid evidence was presented and I still did not accept something. You're guilty of the exact thing you're accusing me of. Show me a handful of posts where you condemned someone on the left, or praised someone on the right. They can't be all one sided, right? I'd throw the same thing back at you. You're not a judge either, but yet you do it every day, including judging me - regularly. And no, it's not a court, but its a forum for discussion. So if you don't like my opinions, fuck right off. You've promised to do so before, but can't help yourself. And with that, I'm out for the weekend to enjoy myself. Try not to think too much about me. I'm sure I'll come back to all the usual vomit from your piehole, but until then, peace out.
Well it makes sense and pretty easy pickings when you think about the undignified treatment these federal employees were given.
Win-win. They get our most productive people, and we don't have to pay for their "productivity" moving forward.