I'm not feigning anything at all, and I honestly couldn't care less what someone like you thinks of me. Really. Not one iota less. Think whatever the hell you want, and pretend it matters.
Probably not, but it's normal to put a hold on funding when you have no idea what the hell is going out the door AND you have evidence of fraud. So until a project is cleared, it has to be held up. It's not the fault of the auditor for flagging all programs, it's the fault and culpability of the people who created the stupid waste in the first place. So look to thine own team for a good portion of that. Someone says "there's a problem here" and the natural reaction is to stop all outflows until you can clear it. Only the criminals involved think this is a bad thing. And their "friends".
I don't need the devil on my side, thanks very much. Go find someone else who doesn't care what you do - there are plenty around here.
"Dander was up" is a nice way of saying 'triggered'... "They deserve a long prison sentence": Musk joins Trump in trashing "60 Minutes" The head of DOGE lashed out over a segment on the slashing of USAID funding By Alex Galbraith Published February 17, 2025 3:16PM (EST) "Elon Musk has come around to his boss' way of thinking, trashing CBS' "60 Minutes" and saying that the team behind the program deserves to be jailed. Musk's dander was up after the long-running newsmagazine shared a promotion of their segment on the proposed slashing of federal funding for USAID. Reporter Scott Pelley began the segment wondering "how serious President [Donald] Trump is in defiance of the Constitution." In a later clip, a Republican former administrator of the aid agency denied Musk's claims of widespread waste. He said on Sunday that USAID is "the most accountable aid agency in the world.” When "60 Minutes" posted about their story on Musk-owned X, the head of the Department of Government Efficiency replied to call them liars. "60 Minutes are the biggest liars in the world! They engaged in deliberate deception to interfere with the last election," he wrote. "They deserve a long prison sentence." That allegation of election interference appears to be a reference to their pre-election interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. After CBS aired different edits of a portion of the interview, Trump accused the network of intentionally meddling with the then-upcoming presidential election. He sued the network for $10 billion. Trump filed that lawsuit in the conservative Northern District of Texas, a move that CBS called judge-shopping in a request to dismiss the case. Though CBS' parent company Paramount has appeared open to settling the case, "60 Minutes" recently made the unprecedented move of sharing all of their recordings from the Harris interview. "In reporting the news, journalists regularly edit interviews – for time, space or clarity. In making these edits, '60 Minutes' is always guided by the truth and what we believe will be most informative to the viewing public – all while working within the constraints of broadcast television," they wrote at the time. "
I agree but Satan has insisted you are not to bother him for eternity so we have to get you upstairs. But how? You are a severe case.
wait..didn't he ask us to find programs worthwhile at USAID..just one.and now he magically finds one to.claim it was reinstated!!! hallelujah! so he knew all along USAID has real programs a d shouldn't have been shut down in masses! hallelujah!!!! just.exposes himself as a liar
https://www.newsweek.com/usaid-elon-musk-starlink-probe-ukraine-2027054 this raised questions worth exploring g
And it would be fucktaredd to conclude USAID had only 1 worthwhile program.....rather than go in and cut bullshit...musktard closed the whole agency
The crazy thing about this is we know exactly 89,106 people aged 99+ received social security in December 2024. Now I will admit this is presumptive but the DOGE geniuses most likely downloaded the entire raw contents of the social security database without cross checking it across the actual spending report. And then compare the spending report to the draw down from the account. This is more presumption but my guess is these guys are uploading incomplete data into some beta AI program and following what the machine tells them.