PLEASE POST the tax assessor links to my lavish cribs… I need to see the addresses and see if these people will give me keys since the properties are mine-Rep. Jasmine Crockett https://disclosures-clerk.house.gov/public_disc/financial-pdfs/2023/10061435.pdf
Did you disable google on your computer? How come your internet works to find bullshit but seesm to fail when you need facts?
The guy has a mouth that looks like a vagina. And then on top of that he directs it toward the American Vice President. Just sayin. I don't see his/her funding being restored anytime this century. Maybe try getting the funding from your own government instead. Let us know how that works out. Rory Stewart’s wife’s charity loses $1m USAID funding days after ex-MP’s bizarre clash with JD Vance https://www.the-independent.com/new...e-mountain-jd-vance-usaid-trump-b2697613.html
The tree frog spawn of evil once again says hey kids, I'm going straight to hell! Follow me! The money was part of funding for an Afgan womens charity (It will be found elsewhere) and because Rory Steward bested him in an argument about charity to strangers. I have a scored ~130 IQ (or did before reading this, well decades ago), why does JD think that is so great? It's just smart enough to know what you don't know pretty much. It's about the threshold needed to project manage / collaborate with very smart people, up to a point. Not like Oppenheimer however. But you wouldn't want to go toe to toe with an expert in an unfamiliar field based on pure brain power. JD thinks you can "Google" theology in a few seconds.. Vance’s comment plays to a populist, anti-elite audience that resents what it sees as a self-important, out-of-touch intellectual class. Stewart by contrast, projects himself as a morally serious thinker engaging in good faith. Vance's speech in Europe was met with a wall of silence, only his staff clapped. It was purely for US domestic consumption, edited for RWM. In essence, Vance’s remark is a calculated insult aimed at discrediting Stewart rather than engaging his argument, while Stewart responds with controlled derision and an appeal to principle. The real conversation about the nature of moral duty gets buried beneath the insult, which is what Vance intended and is too obvious to be called a win by him.