The 4 stages of the SCT trader

Discussion in 'Psychology' started by bluebolt, Jun 11, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Let's rephrase that

    Just to keep it simple, I would classify my important contributions in two ordinary categories called "Mass Delusion and "Baffle Them With Bullshit. These, with respect to trading, I would say my victims are in the low hundreds. Historically, I (we, if you count the voices in my head) used the standard method of misleading them into the financial industry (IPTSTA - which means Ignore Profits, Trade Stupidly, STC Torments All).
     
    #31     Jun 14, 2008
  2. Tums

    Tums


    Usually people who has never traded more than one contract would have questions like this -- they simply have not experienced the duty and responsibility that goes with the privilege of trading multi-contracts.
     
    #32     Jun 15, 2008
    Sprout likes this.
  3. slacker

    slacker

    Excellent point! I agree completely.

    So, Tums, maybe you can answer this question, "With hundreds of Hershey techniques to select from which technique would you say is the most clearly 'Hershey' in its creative implementation?"

    What uniquely Hershey technique has helped you make the most money?
     
    #33     Jun 15, 2008
  4. Tums

    Tums


    You are hopelessly clueless as to what and why you are asking.
     
    #34     Jun 15, 2008
  5. slacker

    slacker

    Perhaps you are right.

    I will ask again.
    Your fellow Hershey traveler, Cocaine, thinks there is nothing new in Hershey's method and that it has all been done before. Hershey said earlier today that there are "hundreds" of intellectual property and trade secrets. Have you seen just one?
     
    #35     Jun 15, 2008
  6. You're so pissed off, you can't even decide which to accusation to pick. Do you believe that "at least one if not many traders in the past" have been plagiarized and their "pre-dated examples written in detail" have been riped of?
    Or, is your problem with the quality of the documentation that had significantly suffered compared to "pre-dated examples written in detail (with much better examples and documentation) by at least one if not many traders in the past"?
    Personally, don't give a shit. But since you're absolutely convinced that for every one of his techniques you can show "a pre-dated example written in detail (with much better examples and documentation) by at least one if not many traders in the past", why not simply learn the techniques using those "(much better examples and documentation), written "by at least one if not many traders in the past", to make money. The more money you make, the less pissed off you will become - until, finally you reach the state where you are no longer pissed off at anybody.
     
    #36     Jun 15, 2008
  7. I'm not sure if you have reading comprehension issues, or you simply exhibit symptoms of mental retardation. If someone posts that the foundation of their system was written about before they were borne, how is it then, that you reached the conclusion that Jack 'invented' anything. Jack has, after all, stated on numerous occassions how he simply built on the techniques used by those who came before him.

     
    #37     Jun 15, 2008
    Sprout likes this.
  8. slacker

    slacker

    Not pissed off at all actually. I have given you no reason to think so from my posts that I can see in re-reading my messages.

    Is everyone who questions the Hershey Method pissed off at something? :(
     
    #38     Jun 15, 2008
  9. Why would anybody give a shit about that particular aspect? Are you really trying to argue who should be credited with what ideas?
     
    #39     Jun 15, 2008
  10. slacker

    slacker

    My concluding that Jack has invented something is a notion has come from Jack himself earlier today in response to the same question. Maybe you missed it:
    Thanks for clearing that up Spyder, I didn't think Hershey developed anything new myself.
     
    #40     Jun 15, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.