The above example reflects a 2.5% return per day Comes out to be ~ $1.8M per year... off $300K (249 trading days this year - w/o factoring in vacation / sick / personal days) And obviously not factoring in several other things Many would kill for that ===================== I'll neither confirm / deny if the above good or bad..., nor based on your response..., share what my specific % per day is RN
If the devil came to earth and told Surf he could average that over the next ten years, he would sell his soul in return. His only request would be for the devil to explain how TA can work and day traders succeed, 2 things he cannot conceive.
So return is (maybe, because we don't know if you really perform on average every day like that) somewhere between 0.0001% and infinite. Pity we cannot judge your performance correctly, but I understand you. In forex you can tell how many pips you do, in ES you can tell how many points you do, all this without making your portfolio public. For stocks it is more difficult.
Pity for y'all..., not me I trade solely for myself..., and my family..., so until you..., or any one else - is willing to share my losses - it no concern to me what anyone thinks of my performance And no..., don't bother asking - I need nothing / am seeking nothing - from anyone When I needed help - no one would..., now I don't - to hell with that noise btw; traders don't judge - they trade an additional btw; obviously you glossed over this portion of my initial response to LL eta - I love the passive aggressive tone to your post - please consider the tone of my response to you; matter of fact - I don't give a shit RN
Difficult because he will trade probably several stocks or other things. So his daily profit is a mix of a few different positions I think.
I understand you like I already told before. If you see passive aggression, you see something that in reality is not there. I have and see no reason to be agressive. Maybe you stumbled across an acorn that was not there?
Good point, though the sum of each percentage would still work fine for comparison purposes. That gives a good unleveraged comparison, across all asset classes. (i.e. 10 points on the NQ is 0.23%, thus equivalent to 0.29 in AAPL or 23 pips (approx.) in Forex) Heh, that's what I hate about text communication: tone is often wildly different between intention and perception. Add the fact that a lot of us are not English native... :eek: