So what were the specific charges. did they relate to method of registration? Perhaps the question you should be asking is whether the fraud related to those convictions you mention would have been prevented by making people drive ten miles to register at an undisclosed location. I'm exagerating to make a point. What we have is a bunch of Republican initiatives to make voter registration more difficult, with zero data to support need. Was the requirement that Sioux Indians were required to have a home address in order to register to prevent voter fraud, or was the requirement intended to reduce the number of Sioux voting? You have a choice, you can wake up in the morning and assume it's raining, or you can look out the window. None of this is Rocket Science.
Stop rambling about registration. These 19 people where not U.S. citizens, registered to vote, and then voted. Despite the big warning in block print at the top of the registration form that you must be a U.S. citizen to register. Now they are convicted and on the deportation list. The evidence in our state shows that voting is now easier and more accessible under the Republicans since 2010 in North Carolina than ever before in our state history - https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...-voter-suppression.326582/page-7#post-4760497
I am trusting that what you reported to us is correct. Should I have assumed it was incorrect? Or are you agreeing with me, that there is no data to support the assertion that there is significant voter fraud in the U.S. due to illegals registering to vote, and therefore the Fox News Story should be treated as further evidence for lack of significant voter fraud due to illegals registering to vote.
Ok then. How many votes cast total in the election in which the 19 illegal immigrants voted. And how many votes did the outcome depend on? Was it greater than 0.03% of the vote? The only North Carolina voter Fraud I heard about was something to do with people, filling out absentee ballots for others. That was North Carolina, right?
So North Carolina found nearly 1000 non-citizens voting (not only registering) after reviewing a small subset of records for a short period of time. The federal district attorney stated that voter fraud has NEVER been properly investigated at any time in the past 5 decades. This is about the facts -- and not a "Fox News" story.
Facebook? Twitter? Is that the same facebook with thousands upon thousands of posts originating in St. Petersburg. Is that the same twitter where Mexico was going to agree to pay for a Wall. Personally, I recommend relying on the Texas Attorney General's data. Although I can't imagine that Facebook and Twitter aren't entirely reliable as sources with unassailable veracity, I still Recommend the Texas State Attorney General's data.
Let's take a look at liberals whining "Why isn't the federal prosecutor investigating the 9th District"? Well lefty clowns... it is because the previous Democratic majority state election board which was disbanded in December as unconstitutional demanded that the U.S. federal attorney not investigate the 9th District fraud until the state board finished its investigation - and got a court injunction to hold off federal involvement. Of course, all the Democratic clowns in our state know this already since the entire move to block the federal investigation was designed to stop the certification of the election. The Democrats did not want Mark Harris declared the winner and desired to hold off any proper investigation that would close the case. It was likely that a quick and proper investigation would lead to a federal court declaring Harris the winner immediately but also quickly prosecuting political operative Dan McCready not only for his ballot activities in the 2016 election but also his absentee ballot fraud for Democrats from 2007 to 2015.
You need no data to get on Fox News, or Tweet. But here you do. Give us any example, just one actual example where you have reliable data from a government agency or disinterested party that shows there is a problem somewhere of illegal immigrants determining the outcome of elections, or even voting in significant, relative numbers. You can't just use the number of illegal votes obviously. You need more data than that. I thought you were involved in some kind of IT or something, so I just assumed you had some training in statistics.
Well let's finally... or the first time.... do a proper investigation to get all the information from all 50 states. Why do you oppose proper investigation of voting fraud and preserving the integrity of our election system.
It’s incredible irony that right wingers call the Mueller investigation a witch hunt but claim there is substantial cause for a full investigation of all 50 states voter rolls. FYI: Trump tried this with the dude from Kansas and it failed so bad they just dissolved it rather than issue a report. I have a better idea, get Trey Gowdy to investigate. We all know he’s a hack investigator who is known for falling flat on his face. He’d be perfect for you’re little charade.