Tesla 2024

Discussion in 'Stocks' started by VicBee, Dec 19, 2023.

  1. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    That's actually the CyberArk... in case Elon underestimates the effects of his early cloud-seeding attempts on Mars.
     
    #451     Jul 3, 2024
    semperfrosty and gwb-trading like this.
  2. Zwaen

    Zwaen

    I zoomed in a bit and found a clue by Elon he wants to populate mars with..
    topdoge.png
     
    #452     Jul 3, 2024
    vanzandt and semperfrosty like this.
  3. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    I wonder if it will work out just as well as his Cybertrucks.

    Fan Boy Finally Questions Tesla After 2 Broken Tesla Cybertrucks In 4 Months
    The owner's second Cybertruck was essentially a giant brick in the hands of Tesla Service
    https://jalopnik.com/fan-boy-finally-criticizes-tesla-after-2-broken-tesla-c-1851573471
     
    #453     Jul 3, 2024
  4. SunTrader

    SunTrader

    Haha to jumpstart it you need access to the "Frunk" which you can't access ... because there is no juice to open it.

    Now to be fair a little some ICE's have a battery in their trunk or under back seat, but most have a manual old fashioned metal key embedded in their key fob/remote to gain access.
     
    #454     Jul 3, 2024
  5. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    Both Cathie Wood and Nancy Pelosy sold TSLA. Just sayin'....
     
    #455     Jul 3, 2024
    NoahA likes this.
  6. SunTrader

    SunTrader

    ! Solllllllllld.png
     
    #456     Jul 3, 2024
  7. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    Well Nancy of course is no "Elite Trader."

    But Cathie... are you sure about that?

    • Cathie Wood Just Put a $2,600 Price Target on Tesla. With the Stock Down 54% From Its Highs, Is Now the Time to Buy?
      By Geoffrey Seiler – Jun 20, 2024 at 5:47AM
      Key Points
    • Cathie Wood set a $2,600 price target on Tesla, representing 14 times upside if hit.

    • A prior target with 12 times upside that Wood made on Tesla in 2018 did come to fruition.


    • While Telsa hitting $2,600 seems unlikely, the stock does not need to hit that target to be a successful investment.
     
    #457     Jul 3, 2024
    semperfrosty likes this.
  8. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    Nancy's husband is an excellent investor and "Nancy" is among the top 5 best politician by trading results. I have a separate thread about just how good they are. Even if you follow their trades by a month delay (that is how they release the data) you still beat the market.

    Nancy switched to NVDA, Cathie got ACHR:

    https://i.redd.it/shydjk2njdad1.jpeg
     
    #458     Jul 4, 2024
  9. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    And that shouldn't tell us something? :rolleyes:

    Regarding Cathie... according to their website, she owns a bunch of TSLA

    upload_2024-7-4_10-17-35.jpeg
     
    #459     Jul 4, 2024
    semperfrosty likes this.
  10. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    Everyone's talking about the robo-taxi's.... and that's all well and good... but you know what, and of course we all do, that last little bit of tech to get there... it's a bitch.

    But here's the thing, making a fully autonomous self driving car has got to be the hardest thing in the world. By comparison, they could use TSLA's technology from 3 years ago and fully automate Air-Force 1. There's no comparison in the levels of difficulty.

    I wrote over two years ago I knew what the next big thing for TSLA would be. One post,and I didn't say what it was. No responses of course so I let it go.

    Well Elon brought it up in the last earnings call, and it will be a HUGE revenue generator going forward. I mean it sounds painfully obvious, but what folks don't understand, the degree of tech required to be "almost there" on Level-V vehicles... it's off the charts. And it's overkill for so many other things.

    Their cash-cow going forward? It's robots.

    I see the first adopters being in senior citizen care. And hospitals. Sure there will be a human one split second away via whatever... and the degree of implementing them, not unlike quasi self driving vehicles... the deployment will be measured at first. But if granny is highly functional, there's no need for Medicare to fork out $45/hour 24/7/365 ---> $394,000/year... when a $$25,000 robot can do the same damn thing.

    And the number of "grannies" out there that will need assistance, is only growing exponentially. Inversely proportional to Medicare and Medicaid funding I might add.

    Now sure... can a robot give granny a bath? No. Not yet at least. But 1 hour per day for a human assistant is a hell of a lot cheaper than a 24 hr. staff. And yes, I think robots can prepare meals if need be.

    It's like everything else with this company... the haters are blind. Tech is where it's at... and say what you want, but in the direction it's inevitably heading... Elon is on the cutting edge... and light years ahead of everyone else. His unwaivered pursuit of that "last mile" in autonomous vehicles has paved the way for so much more than any of you can fathom.

    When you guys saw this stock blow thru $214 and not even give back a penny... whatever. It's only going up.

    Hate him all you want... but Elon's a traveler. Of time.
    ~vz
     
    #460     Jul 7, 2024
    semperfrosty, VicBee and Zwaen like this.