It is Bush's fault and history has shown that appeasment is the correct approach. We must find out why we are so offensive to these wonderful terrorist groups and find out what we can do to change. Perhaps we could all convert to living in the seventh century. Insist that all the atheists on this board convert to islam, cover our women, not have premarital sex and let all our leaders keep the money they generate from out natural resources.
According to Al Jazeera... well, read for yourself... "Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar called crisis talks to discuss the attacks which the government swiftly blamed on the separatist Basque group ETA, although the banned Batasuna political party denied the charge." "Speaking on Radio Popular in the Basque country, Arnaldo Otegi, leader of banned radical political party Batasuna, said ... "the attacks could have been 'an operation by sectors of the Arab resistance.'" Arab resistance. Sam
"Peace?" What does "peace" have to do with the Madrid terrorist train bombing massacre? What does it have to do with Bush? Is war suddenly "peace?" Bush is the one who creates all these ongoing and present "wars." Say it ain't so. The point is, this (being terrorism attacks) is all ongoing. Bush with his blowing billions chasing global "Evil" has zero impact. Do you REALLY think Bush gives a flying FUKUI about anything other than his re-election? Cheers! Sam
Figure out who is behind this, and you got the answers behind terrorism in the new century. . . . Videos Show Building 7's Vertical Collapse. 3 different news stations http://www.wtc7.net/videos.html The video is worth a million words. It was not hit by the planes why did it collapse? Controlled demolition sure looks like it. http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/7down.wmv . . . . .
You are unbelieveably naive if you think this administration does not see the value of terrorist attacks to it's hold on power. Get real. You are the stupid one. m
When I suggested keeping an open mind earlier in this thread, I didn't mean keeping it so open that the wind starts blowing right through your ears. If you had any background in physics and engineering, you would understand that there really isn't any other way for a building to collapse.
I don't believe I've ever engaged you with any insults. If you are unable to read, please do not respond again. The point is not about HOW it collapsed, but what caused it to collapse. (the building was not hit by the planes) I'd suggest YOU would keep an open mind, look at what is presented, AND refrain from attacking the posters. Building 7 underwent a total structural collapse at around 5:20 PM. Although there were few people in the area to witness its destruction, several videos captured the event. Like the collapses of the Twin Towers, the collapse of Building 7 commenced suddenly and was over in seconds. At first the penthouse, which rests on central columns, began to drop. Within a second the entire building began to drop as a whole, falling into its footprint in a precisely vertical fashion. The destruction of Building 7 looked exactly like a standard controlled demolition. It is commonly believed that "ancillary damage" from the collapses of the Twin Towers led to the collapse of WTC 7. In fact Building 7 was separated from the North Tower by Building 6 and Vesey Street. A photograph of its north facade taken in the afternoon shows isolated small fires, and not even a single window was broken http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc7.html