You may want to pas this on to Obama, he obviously wants to limit viewing of FOX. So we don't need to ban guns after all, just educate people who use them. I agree. And we can forget about breathalyzer ignitions on cars you suggested recently, we just need to educate the drunks. Forget arbitrary road speed limits, just educate drives on how to handle high speeds. Race car drivers do it all the time. Hey no more hunting seasons. We'll just educate hunters as to know when enough is enough. Weight limits for transport trucks? Forgetaboutit, surely between educating the truck drivers and the honor system we don't need those limits anymore. Oh you'll like this one. Eliminate the age of consent. We'll just educate the pedophiles so they can properly identify the minimum age for their next victim.
Straw man argument. Stick to the issue of voting, please. Either you want to run a free market (no term limits) or you don't want a free market when it comes to elections (term limits). If you oppose free markets when it comes to voting, then that would make you a socialist thinker...
Do Americans understand that the death rate on the Autobahn is less than on American highways? The Germans are allowed to drive faster, but they are also are required to PAY ATTENTION... no cell phones, no texting... Hell, German cars (sold in Germany) don't even have cup holders... Americans are SO FUCKING STPUID... total waste of skin and oxygen...
Bad idea. Needing such protection would send a message to congress that they actually do know what's best for us. I would not be opposed to basic pre-vote testing with simple questions about who the leaders of the House and Senate are and which party they belong to. Apply the same testing to the candidates and their running mates. Such basics might protect those of us who do study the issues from the stupidity of those who don't when voting time arrives. Just as a no-vote might be considered a vote for the opposition, an un-educated vote might cancel out an educated vote.
A very good idea, how do we get it implemented? Especially when the liberals and ACLU step in the way.
Such a device would be D.O.A. simply because the outcome of such testing would show different levels of education in politics. Can you imagine the outcry by those who failed to answer such basic questions? By the same token, if a test were failed there would be no reason not to retake it after a brush up. Such testing might serve as a way to educate voters about those they vote for rather than eliminate them from the process. Some, myself included, believe that many in congress are content to have uneducated voters dependent on them and would never have an open mind to changing that dynamic.