Tell Jack they stole SCT

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by bluebolt, Jun 5, 2008.

  1. Does technical analysis work?

    by Simon Wilson

    http://www.moneyweek.com/file/2522/technical-analysis.html

    Predicting market movements using charts is often derided as mumbo-jumbo. But that’s not fair. In fact, it is a very useful part of an investor’s toolkit.
    What is technical analysis?

    The art of looking at the past price movements and trade volumes (of a stock, index or commodity, for example) and using the patterns and trends to predict future price movements - and make buy/sell decisions. Most technical analysis is done using charts, so that trends and patterns are easy to see. Consequently, technical analysts are sometimes called chartists. It’s a very different approach from fundamental analysis: chartists assume that markets and prices are related to the psychology of the market participants more than to factors such as the health and management of the relevant economy, sector or firm.
    How does it work?

    In its most simple form, technical analysis is simply about identifying the trend lines on a price chart. Trends are plotted by connecting the peaks in a share-price graph to make the ‘resistance line’ and the troughs to make a ‘support line’. Between the two lines is the current trading range of the stock, and if you extend the lines you have the presumed future range. Any breakouts from these ranges signal a reverse in the long-term trend (or an inflection point) from bullish to bearish, or vice versa. Finding these inflection points is the key to successful investing: they mark the point where it is time to get out of an old trend and into a new one.
    Are patterns really that easy to spot?

    Not often - most technical analysis involves spending hours pouring over charts trying to figure out if something counts as a trend or not, and if so what the parameters might be. Still, some chart patterns are clearer than others. One of the most well-known visual patterns in charting is the head-and-shoulders pattern, but even this can be hard to spot: while it is happening, how can you be sure it is happening? The pattern is a series of three peaks where the middle peak is the highest. The pattern is confirmed by drawing in the ‘neckline’ linking the other two highs and lows, and observing the direction of movement. The pattern in chart B suggests a downward reversal because the price has broken back through the neckline. The same pattern inverted would suggest an upward trend.

    What about moving averages?

    Moving averages are a tool used by chartists to trigger buy/sell decisions. For example, chart C (below) is a graph of the FTSE 100 at the bottom of the bear market in 2003. Chartists hold that where a shorter-term moving average (say 50-day) crosses a longer-term average (say 200-day) as the market is rising, it represents a long-term buy signal. Moving averages can be a useful tool for identifying trends in a market, but chart C also illustrates one of the frequent charges levelled against technical analysis - that it comes too late. By the time the trend is identified, a big part of the move is over. Here, nearly half the market move was made before the buying signal appeared.
    What other tools are there?

    Dedicated chartists use a bewildering array of analytical tools and technical indicators to alert, confirm and predict. An excellent starting place to find out more is online at www.stockcharts.com/education. In addition to the concepts already discussed, the two most important ideas are momentum and relative strength. The momentum, or rate-of-change in a stock’s price or trading volume, is often measured by a particular ‘oscillating’ indicator, while the relative strength of a stock usually charts how it is performing against a particular index.
    Do any of them really work?

    Technical analysts make big claims for their art, but there is good reason to be suspicious of the idea that charts alone are the path to riches. However you look at it, future price movements do not cause and cannot be derived from past movements; price charts do not have a life of their own (they are simply a good way of visualising the real-world price movements of a security; and all analysts should be careful of confusing correlation with cause. That said, technical analysis should not be ignored. There are some good arguments in its favour and the best investors see it as an excellent addition to their investing tool kit. Chart patterns simply represent the past behaviour of a pool of investors. Since that pool doesn’t change rapidly, we might expect to see similar patterns in the future. And we do: the same patterns recur so often that it isn’t wise to bet against them.
    So how are charts best used?

    In conjunction with fundamental analysis. Many top investors use fundamental analysis to tell them what to buy and technical analysis to spot trends that tell them when to buy. Britain’s investing guru Anthony Bolton of Fidelity Special Situations fund is known for his value style of investing, for example. But he also depends on charts. “If I were on a desert island and allowed just one investing tool,” he says, “ it would be a chart.”
     
  2. LOL

    The existence of one thing does not negate the reality of another.

    [​IMG]

    ... and FTR, I'm a trend-follwer myself, but I see plenty of SCT type moves all the time ...
     
  3. I've never seen SCT explained so succinctly :p
     
  4. Quote from bluebolt:

    Kind of a disconnect here:

    "Predicting market movements using charts is often derided as mumbo-jumbo. But that’s not fair. In fact, it is a very useful part of an investor’s toolkit."

    AND THEN

    "Technical analysts make big claims for their art, but there is good reason to be suspicious of the idea that charts alone are the path to riches. However you look at it, future price movements do not cause and cannot be derived from past movements; price charts do not have a life of their own [/B
     
  5. Just to be clear.

    "Your problem isn't with the tenets of SCT, your problem is with Jack Hershey".
     
  6. Clear as mud Mandles, both are as ridiculous as each other

    Seamless Continuous Paper Trading
     
  7. stereo70

    stereo70

    god you're an idiot...give it a rest
     
  8. Yawn, ever heard of John Murphy?
     
  9. Exactly! ... and a few others to boot :D
     
    #10     Jun 7, 2008