The green commentary is filled with many errors. Some are repeated in the prior blue comments. for those who want the corrections review: 1. Nested fractals. 2. Our definitions of retrace and reversal (which included the differentiations) 3. The single pattern which provides the order of events. 4. How bookmarking ftt's and FTT's work. 5. The significance of point 2 as desribed by space zones on "clean page four. 6. The math used in trading systems is dictated by the markets: The result is Boolean Algebra where the values (1's and 0's) are assigned to the first derivative of P and V with respect to time. As such, vector values are used exclusively. CW uses scalar values and probability statisitics. These wo apporaches could not befurther apart. Trading ftt's or FTT's was dealt with in detail with SKO and the window of the trade was expressed as a period from the first chance to the second chance. The conversation was didactic rather than as is this rather angry back and forth. I made the point that a person wedded to CW cannot use PEP and its applications (PVT, SCT and SSR) effectively since they are separate parts of a Venn universe and do not overlap very much if at all. Science requires deductive methods. And it is good to have a common vocabulary. CW is basically an inductive betting and risk control process. Neb uses such he tells us. I do not. We also have different belief systems which do not overlap. My suggestion is that I will ignore him from now on.