Technical analysis :useless junk science

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by oilfxpro, Sep 1, 2012.

  1. My performance is irrelevant to the discussion. Why are you obsessed with it?
     
    #331     Sep 27, 2012
  2. Suppose you went to a heart specialists and he said, All the other doctors are wrong and I'm right. So you asked, How many of your patients have died? And this guy says, Well, most of them but that's irrelevant to the discussion.

    Well, I have one question...

    Would you trust that this guy knows what he is talking about?

    If you want to offer an opinion, the length you can confidently stick you neck out is directly proportional to what you can show you understand. If it ain't working for you.... wind your neck in :D
     
    #332     Sep 27, 2012
  3. Brass

    Brass

    Because you ridicule any argument that disagrees with your own but you refuse to tabulate or summarize the net results of your own broadcasted trades IN YOUR OWN JOURNAL. You're the guy with all the fancy proprietary drivers that put all of TA to shame. PROVE IT. Where's the beef? Otherwise, and for the love of dogs, STFU. Or at least stop your bogus journal where you try to BS your way out of your many bad calls.

    I hope that helps.
     
    #333     Sep 27, 2012
  4. Fritsone is de man , he can smell these old farts of t/a secrets , but frits can sum it up in a few words .He knows enough to say it is useless , and all you posters have given is opinions.
     
    #334     Sep 27, 2012
  5. The problem with your request and the other red herring attempts to discredit is that I MAKE NO CLAIMS. Unlike the scores of TA super traders who inhabit this site. I have personal reasons why I can't talk about net worth, net results, real, simulation in public. Perhaps if anyone actually knew your identity, and the other avatars on this site, they would understand why its stupid to reveal too much...but anything goes from behind the veil.

    surf
     
    #335     Sep 27, 2012
  6. Have you read Nick Radge's Unholy Grails ?
    He has statistics for trend following systems showing a positive return above market averages, which I think you're say is impossible. What kind of backtest results do you have with your price driver systems, can it be tested. It seems judging the effect of a news story in hindsight and real time would/could be very different.
     
    #336     Sep 27, 2012
  7. Brass

    Brass

    Are you kidding me? Then why have a journal in which you broadcast your calls but cannot summarize the net results of those very calls that you choose to broadcast in that journal?
     
    #337     Sep 27, 2012
  8. No I've given calls - lots of them, and the last one I even posted that Friday is before Monday so you won't keep saying it is hindsight.

    Now how about you demonstrating how much you really know and making a call. Should be real easy as you make 40,000 pips a year.

    We're waiting Oily...

    Put up or shut up :D
     
    #338     Sep 27, 2012
  9. Surmise to say, you simply don't get it.
     
    #339     Sep 27, 2012
  10. I have not heard of that book. I'll definitely take a look. thanks for the heads up! surf

    Took a look-- his wife owns his publishing company and it only takes 10 minutes a day to get rich? Ok, that's about all I need to know.. thanks anyway... but i'll give him a plug since i respect anyone who writes and publishes their own stuff.

    http://www.radgepublishing.com/?wps...-the-road-to-wealth-in-under-10-minutes-a-day
     
    #340     Sep 27, 2012