http://www.agmarketlogic.com/Compounding.htm "personal results will <i>very</i>." yes, ofcourse they will very. and this--- "there's no difference between trading one contract and 100 if you follow the rules" maybe on a simulator! "I will devote the bulk of my professional time in teaching these proofs, and I do mean proofs to all the farmers and ranchers willing to open up their mind to the possibility of a perfect understanding of price in their specific marketplaces..........." proofs!! are you serious??? seriously, there are large funds arbing the physicals against the futures all day long in these AG markets------ best wishes in guesing surf
That is patently untrue. However there are reported rumors of Jack being able to elevate a hot air balloon just by talking to it. Any topic will do, but the highest elevation has been achieved following a talk he gave about trading. Discussions regarding a trans Atlantic crossing are underway. Any conclusions you may draw are merely conjecture.
Spydertrader, while the big phonies here are busy dodging your trading challenge, I would like to discuss terms, my intention being to take you up on it in a year or two. As I see it there are eight issues in a challenge between you and me. SIZE (no, not THAT size): what is the maximum number of cars you normally trade during the day, as it would be unfair to you to trade less than you normally do simply for the pleasure of humiliating me. MARGIN REQUIREMENTS: if you don't use IB, we would have to normalize the number of cars we are permitted to commit to equalize the difference between our respective brokers' margin requirements on ES and NQ INTEGRAL NUMBER OF CARS: obviously the total margin allowed to each of us must prmit an integral number of cars, and this could get large. HISTORICAL PROFITABILITY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ES AND NQ: I will run the numbers if you want the number of cars traded to account for this. HANDICAP: How much'll ya gimme for bein' a duffer? SECONDS: I assume we'll trade all day. In that case, being an old man, and not wishing to embarass myself by peeing in a cup, I at least will need someone to baby my position a few times each day. PEANUT GALLERY: Can the B-Team come heckle? Eighteen of them are no problem, they're just inside my head (you won't accuse me of cheating if I consult them?), but I would definitely appreciate some immoral support. ANN-ONYMITY: Can I trade in a burkha? All the best. Mike.
Oh, Artie just suggested we could keep it simple and define winning as the highest percentage of the daily range achieved per car traded, regardless of size, and excluding commissions. (He says that way I could trade just one car to your 10,000).
This seems to be ProfLogic's belief system (followed from this website): http://www.seminar-shop.com/static/presse/artikel,1518377.html "I finally settled on the Ergodic (greek for energy) indicator because of its flexibility to perfectly match the movement and oscillation of any Market." Perfectly? "The answer was simple, but I had to revert to Physics and good old Albert Einstein to answer it." Physics doesn't answer anything. Plenty of people have tried using cycle analysis, FFT and other things (John Ehlers MESA is the preeminent one eg - but he has become a flop - check out his eminiz.com performance) "With this critical information I then developed a PERFECT indicator to show EXACTLY (to the minute) where a Market changes direction: ⢠The bubble bursting in the Market was first warned on September 6, 2000 with the first Prime Resistance Failure in the Market in four years. ⢠This followed by the confirmation of the Bull Market breaking into a Bear Market on November 22, 2000. ⢠The first warning of the last Bear Market completing in the E-mini S&P was on March 14, 2003 with the first Prime Support failure in the Market in three years. ⢠Our current Bull Market was creadted int eh E-mini S&P first with a Minor Bull Trend being created on April 21, 2003 at 10:04 am EST. ⢠The Prime Bull Trend in the E-mini S&P started on may 27, 2003 at 3:13 pm EST. This was the exact time the industry was arguing that the move up in the Market was just a correction in the overall Bear Market. It is obvious we are in a Bull Market now, but how many people do you know can give you the exact time it started?" A perfect indicator? This man is full of himself. Why is he so afraid of going mano a mano, if he is so perfect? "eSignal and Ensign then coordinated the introduction of Volume Bar Charts into their Technical Analysis mix. This is what I had been waiting for." Most people here on ET think volume is not particularly helpful. Price action is what people follow. "Because the LogicMethodology(tm) is based on Absolutes, or occurrences that happen 100% of the time in the Market. The LogicMethodology(tm) ELIMINATES the variable effect in trading, and takes the discretion out of the decision process a trader goes through when placing any trade." Great. Then you shouldn't have to hide or run away anymore. For once in your life, prove that there is more than smoke and mirrors. I notice the lack of an audited track record in your website, though. Surely you are so good, that you shouldn't fear having others see your performance? "Over the course of my seminar, we will go into great detail as to how and why this simple approach to trading works flawlessly. You will learn to read the blueprint the ever changing electronic Market presents traders from day-to-day." How about submitting the flawless blueprint to testing, instead of talking all the time? Why do you keep ducking challenges and demanding the ridiculous? Stand up and trade in front of everyone, instead of hiding behind your claims? Think of what an audited record will do for your "seminars." no more "trust me, a man you do not know." You can say, "See, it works?" You are a fellow comp sci person. YOu know that they don't put something our without vigorous testing! No project manager accepts "you say it works? Great! let's ship it!!!"