Technical Analysis = CRAP

Discussion in 'Technical Analysis' started by Frits, Apr 27, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Amen!
     
    #831     Jun 29, 2011
  2. I can only imagine we did.

    Great ideas aren't born in a vacuum.
     
    #832     Jun 29, 2011
  3. I wish I still looked like that.
    Doing speaking engagements for free was tiring but informative.
    That was almost 8 years ago and right after I taught my first class.
     
    #833     Jun 29, 2011
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I have to agree.
     
    #834     Jun 29, 2011
  5. bone

    bone

    Curious, has anyone been able to take whatever gems of technical analysis goodness has been sprinkled upon us during this odyssey of a thread and made any money from it ?

    If it takes 139 pages to highjack a thread and explain one's trading model ...
     
    #835     Jun 29, 2011
  6. That depends on whether or not they know what gems look like, and if they can put them in the right order to fit their individual psychological profile.
     
    #836     Jun 30, 2011
  7. hijack?

    Forums
    ›› Technically Speaking
    ›› Technical Analysis
    ›› Technical Analysis = CRAP

    I would assume a discussion on whether TA is crap or not would include examples of potential systems that would fall into the "non-crap" categories. Just like it should include systems that are crap. Most good, reasonable and adult discussions I've ever been involved in are a balance of both sides of that question.
     
    #837     Jun 30, 2011
  8. Isn't that same ancient pic used on your Twitter feed? There must be professional fotogs -- even in Ohio -- who could re-shoot you? :confused:
     
    #838     Jun 30, 2011

  9. My brother, an objective system should be removed from psychology issues. Unless there are serious wealth wounds with the users and/or terrified money--- this psych stuff like I have read in this thread---doesnt make sense to me.

    In addition there is only one right order to an objective system. Otherwise, it's not objective.
     
    #839     Jun 30, 2011
  10. No, different pic I think but it doesn't matter.
     
    #840     Jun 30, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.