They vary from day to day as the tempo varies. For instance I had a long trade via the 86/87 min chart yesterday a little before 2pm. Today, these frames may carry no weight. I essentially have to search through time frames each day to find the ones that the mkt is operating on via my method. Fortunately, have been doing this a while so I've gotten so used to the routine that I can almost do it in my sleep ....kidding of course... but my routine is strongly ingrained in me after a lot of time.
This is getting ridiculous: Here is prof logic caught once again--- http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=33456&perpage=6&pagenumber=11 You should quit fighting before someone posts screenshots of your old websites. Surf The quant from DB is currently trading a variation of what I expound and I even went to the UK to spend a week with him going over the Method. We communicate monthly. He trades stocks so he uses it in equities where I show most examples in the Futures. The application is identical. As far as this thread loosing focus . . . I just want an answer to my question since this is my forum . . . if possible. If I am proved wrong, so be it but PROVE me wrong just don't make unsubstantiated statements. I detailed my method in this thread in various responses. I even had one individual pick up on the fact that I did reveal everything here. I love when people use their brains. The lack of someone taking those pieces, putting them together an then taking the time to scientifically prove me wrong, proves a point. It's easier to "Say" it can't be done, then to prove it can't be done. It would be nice just to hear someone say, "I'll try to prove it wrong", but that would imply someone must first put forth the effort. Effort that is not willing to be expended.
I have. I taught classes at 2 state universities before I retired to trade full time and develop software. I was only allowed to give multiple classes on each campus after the assistant dean and the head of the economics department audited my class for value at one college and at the other a respected alumni had to review the class to the education department. I taught multiple classes at each college. Your tirades are getting old and I thought you were going to concentrate this time on your wife-to-be. What, is she reading the lies you post here and called off the blessed day?
Even if true, this isn't "academic vindication" by any stretch. The only evidence of you teaching at a university was in a rented room for a $3k plus seminar. Your not listed on the facility list anywhere-- just post a link. Maybe I can't find it.
@Surf Do want a certain dollar amount to be proven wrong, or a certain amount of time? When these statements get posted, I mean.
A variation isn't the same as what I do. If I remember correctly he traded stocks and FOREX. He since moved to Australia and I lost track of him. You just don't get it. Do you stay in contact with all of your college instructors? Normal people don't. Once he learned to apply want I do to his environment, there was no longer a need to stay in contact with me. You are in absolutely no position to threaten anyone seeing the stalking and harassing you have been caught doing on this website. You need to drop it now.
No this was aimed at you, sir. You state that there is no such animal as effective TA. You are incorrect, decisively so. You will of course require statement. Will, say, taking a small account to a large over a period of time suffice? At what point will you say, I stand corrected?
No statement or money required at all. Just send me the code of an objective day trading TA system that is consistently profitable. I'll have it tested, and if it produces results outside of expected chance/randomness--- I'll happily stand corrected. It's really simple. Thanks, Surf