@Proflogic, There is no "smear campaign", no personal attacks from me, and I certainly didn't "enlist" anyone else. Knock off the threats, mistruths and bizarre claims. I have not seen the new book but knowing Covel's style-- he will allow each persons own words, websites, and posts speak purely for themselves and allow the reader to decide for themselves. Good luck in your threatened campaign against the publisher as that's how author grievances are handled. In addition, no need to personally test an objective system. Personal testing assumes subjective methods. An objective method will prove itself or disprove itself by tests without personal input. Why not just post the results of your tests here for analysis? That would shut up your critics if the tests support your claims. Right? Peace , Surf Ps. I believe maverick is organizing a island cruise for he and don bright to debate the merits of various trading forms. I will attend--- thought you should be invited to add to the debate---
You just impressed the shit out of me and validated that great ideas aren't born in a vacuum. One of my old students reads a chart on the basis of "Where Price WILL NOT Go" and then sell naked options based on that information. We talked and he said said that reading a chart teaches a person to understand "Where price will immediately go" so why not take advantage of the information on the other side of that information. Well Done!!
A majority of your banned aliases have been verified coming from your ISP. Not by me mind you but from an outside source. The personal attacks you posted from those aliases have all been documented, copied and saved. You say what you want but your own words are your own demise. You might not have personally enlisted anyone but you didn't help stop the spread of the misinformation you were promoting. I didn't threaten you what I said was a promise. I am tired of your stalking and harassing tactics by you personally and your other aliases. Only you can stop them. My statements aren't mistruths, they are the truth. Any the only thing "bizarre" is your actions. I've not seen his new book either but from his posts on this forum and his tactics of attacking individuals that don't agree with his opinions one can only guess at the content. I repeat, I've given him the ability to tell the truth about what I do through testing and he has chosen not to do that. Yes, the public will make up their own minds whether to trust an author that takes statements out of context to sell a book, that sells information found for free on the internet for thousands of dollars, writes books about "Trends" yet when asked to define one, dodges the question and openly ridicules & flames individuals that disagree with his views over a highly respected PhD Forensic Economist with nothing to gain over his unbiased assessment of fact. Have it on dry land and you have a deal. On the sea with you on board is too much of a temptation to feed the aquatic sea life.
I've posted the results of the data in the past and you ridiculed it and slammed it as being photo-shopped and made up. Why do you refuse to test it yourself? What better way to answer ALL of YOUR questions than to test it YOURSELF? What are you SCARED OF?
Wow, a new way to try to get around testing this yourself. You are a loser of the highest (or lowest) order.
Sort of like the other denials you cling to and refuse to personally validate? By the way the link didn't work . . . sort of like you.
The HFT canard? Really? Man, that's hacky. It's the equivalent of some trader in the 1800's blaming the sunspot cycle.
That was some time ago but I seem to remember it had to do with price movement and how to recognize the pattern oscillations it creates. It was a just discussion group that was put on by one of the local banks and I made a presentation.
It's completely true that HFT has changed the market forever. It's bizare that folks will actually dispute this fact. Keep looking at the charts, they will lead the way---NOT!