You are a pathological liar and you say . . "to the best of my knowledge"? You have no first hand information on anything because you can't use Google and can't read English. Your comprehension of a simple English sentence or question is less than 7 year old and you list yourself as a journalist. I repeat, You said you would respect someone YOU picked to review my system and would stick to it. You picked Hombre (any of you out there can PM him and ask him) a few years year ago and after he gave his review you made some snide remark about it and have ignored it since. You were given the opportunity to test the beta version of my program, you declined making more snide remarks about not wanting to come to the Midwest with a bunch of ignorant farmers to learn how to load and set up the program. Now when I offer it again, for the full release version, your initial response was that "you would give it to someone else to test", why, because you are a computer illiterate and you ARE ALL TALK. Why do I still offer to let you test it . . . first because I don't have any problems with you or one of you "High Math" people screwing it up and it would still work for you and second to show I stand by my word UNLIKE YOURSELF! Now, I repeat again . . . why are refusing to answer the questions about Rosenberg? Still having a problem reading English? I know you subscribe to Futures Magazine.
That isn't a personal attack that is the truth. I only state it when you post a varifiable blatant lie.
Mark, My method is fully programmable and 100% objective. I've built money management into the system as well. For a manual trader there are other factors that always need considered but for a fully automatic system, it is complete (the trades are manually executed though. You are given chart audio, visual chart and email alerts for all trades). When completed, if you want to test it, you are welcome to, as well. Bill
I did, thanks. I take every trade I can on my method unless something gets between me and the keyboard.
First, I'm very happy with my method and results. Thus, thanks for the offer but no thanks. The issue for me isn't if a method is 100% objective nor if it's fully programmable into a mechanical alert system. Simply, if it is not "automation trading"...there's discretion element involved by the user although the method is 100% objective. Simply, if the trades are manually executed as you stated...any flaws with the trader using the 100% objective will have an impact on the results. Thus, there's a discretionary element whenever trades are done manually...that element is the user...not the 100% objective method. In contrast, an automation system does the trading for you. It places the buys, sells, position size management, money management...you start the program in the morning and come back at the end of the day. Manual trade execution is NOT automation trading even if the trade signals are 100% objective. Thus, many of those variables I mentioned earlier DO have an impact on the results of a user whenever manual trade execution is the source of executing trades. Thus, the profits are NOT via TA exclusively. Therefore, out of curiosity, is there a reason why your program isn't fully automated (no manual trade executions) or is it something you'll eventually develop ??? Mark
Mark is right Why are the trades manually executed? Something doesn't smell right here. It's clearly a subjective system sold under the guise of objective program. Bogus! As I have maintained from the first time I saw the Near "perfect" track record on the website. Chart audio? Why not just red light green light like wise trade? Email alerts? Is this the same thing you couldn't get past the provisional patent stage or is this the noble prize nomination creation?
Interesting that you seem to assume you know how I reached that target, i.e. I "guessed". OK, apparently you're a mind-reader in addition to all your other skills.
Geez Surf, did you really say this? You'd think a guy as rotund as you would be rather grateful to Midwestern farmers. Don't bite the hand that overfeeds you.
Of course I never called farmers ignorant. My ancestors were farmers, it's a noble profession in most cases. However farmers can be ignorant of the financial markets making them easy targets of system sellers. Surf