Taleb fund and how it profited

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by cdcaveman, Aug 29, 2015.

  1. #31     Aug 30, 2015
  2. That's wrong and exactly my point. They didn't bet $6B...nobody would invest with them if that was the case.

    They are providing convexity not available in listed vanillas. That is worthwhile and impressive and people pay for it. It's that simple.
     
    #32     Aug 30, 2015
    Maverick74 and i960 like this.
  3. MadeMan

    MadeMan

    what i heard .. if it doesnt work out... he gets back.. between 60% - 85% of his capital.. ie. losing 15% to 40%
    so yea.. slow bleeder that is..
     
    #33     Aug 30, 2015
  4. MadeMan

    MadeMan

    iam on an experiment which somehow fit talebs teachings .. but in a different way
    but then again.. its all "cut losses short and let winners run" .. except for the last two trades which i didnt managed according to my plan.. but hey! what eva..

    they are still open .. so enough time to repair ;)

    xxx1.PNG
     
    #34     Aug 30, 2015
  5. Maverick74

    Maverick74

  6. #36     Aug 30, 2015

  7. I finally got a minute to watch this video... I freaking love this guy...
     
    #37     Aug 31, 2015
    palawan likes this.
  8. Maverick74

    Maverick74

     
    #38     Aug 31, 2015
    cdcaveman, kinggyppo, Visaria and 2 others like this.
  9. MadeMan

    MadeMan

    xxx1.PNG
     
    #39     Sep 1, 2015
  10. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    Just to go more into details on why people don't like him (and since you asked), here is an Amazon reviewer of his book:

    "The author repeatedly reminds readers that he is well traveled, is a "voracious" reader, pursues his exercise routines "assiduously", and is from upper class Mediterranean roots. Further, at some points in the book, he writes from a bitterness and contempt (which he admits) for journalists, economics, others in his profession, and generally those who are not "literate persons"."

    And this was a 3 stars review... Now here is a 1 star review:

    "This author should be named Narcisist, not Nassim. The rest of the book is devoted to propping himself up in his own version of an occupational caste system, where he is on some higher plain because he fancies himself to be some sort of quant jock who knows basic statistics and probabilities. In the meantime, he manages to insult MBAs, academics, specific authors, people who live provident lifestyles, successful but "non-quant" traders, scientists (those with poor social and hygene skills), dentists, and on and on. Pompus, self-serving, and hollow."

    I hope that answered your question... :)
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2015
    #40     Sep 1, 2015