Your lockdown argument is not supported by historical facts because you don't have any facts showing wide work stoppages. As I said you pointed out some anecdotal evidence about limited shutdowns. You are now trying to argue they would have shutdown if they had been more interconnected. Maybe, maybe not. But, the point is you are bullshitting when you say your lockdown is supported by history. By the way I am all for the shutdown of international travel. Trump should have done more but he got ripped by the left for doing what he did do. Ask the FED about whether this shutdown has to end and whether the lockdown has caused massive amounts to not work... . For instance 55% of L.A. is unemployed... https://www.businessinsider.com/mor...-workers-unemployed-due-to-coronavirus-2020-4