Passports to prove you've had vaccine, as discussed a year ago and laughed at by the likes of WRB have pretty much been pushed through everywhere defo UK nobody seems to care, as long as they leave the pubs alone for a while. Why do they want us to take a vaccine, for a virus that's just over hyped in every way and less dangerous for people under 70 than the Flu is, with an average death age of 85, which is 8years ontop of the average normal age of death, arrggghhhhh!! Is it just CONTROL to push a Great Reset on us all, or is it also a screw us up and depopulate us move aswell, have to wait and see, and if the first vaccines don't kill you all, maybe the 3monthly booster shots for well a nothing will. Someone got a Covid isn't a real pandemic into the news papers this weekend, nice, there sacked obviously but atleast they went out in style.
As stated many times since the first week of the Pandemic last year...we're living in a digital age. It's just too easy for governments to use today's technology to encourage vaccinations and use it as a source to create revenue for countries via purchases of "vaccination passports". One of the first countries I saw talking about such was in the Scandinavian countries and a month after that it was the airline industry discussing such. It's your choice to not get vaccinated but don't try to use social media to tell others not to get vaccinated. Yet, anti-vaxxers will be denied access to many services because government / businesses do not want to be liable for the actions of their ignorant Covidiot customers that wants to use their services. Strangely, most countries have had vaccination requirements since the 70's. The difference now is that most countries now have a digital way to share the info from one country to the next country. Thus, I expect there will be a lot of fight back from privacy organizations. All the Covidiots here at ET, since early in the Pandemic, argue this will never occur as if they had the ability to stop Scandinavia countries and the EU from protecting their citizens. More importantly, if someone lives in a country that's not going to require proof of vaccination...you'll still need to show proof of vaccination to travel to any of the countries that will require such. ---------- Covid passports: What are different countries planning? The need to get a Covid vaccine certificate before you travel across Europe this summer is closer to becoming reality. EU leaders have backed introduction of a "Digital Green Certificate", but some countries, inside and outside the EU, have already announced plans for "vaccine passports". How will the EU vaccine passport work? The aim of the EU pass is to get travel moving across borders, "without discrimination", but getting it all organised in a short space of time will be a significant challenge. EU leaders have called for legal and technical work to go ahead "as a matter of urgency" while maintaining restrictions on non-essential travel for the moment. The original plan is for the certificate to be in place for the summer but that deadline could be hard to meet. The certificate, either digital or on paper, will enable anyone vaccinated against Covid, or who has tested negative, or recently recovered from the virus, to travel across all 27 member states. The EU also wants to include non-EU countries such as Norway, Iceland and Switzerland. Dutch sign up in droves for Covid test holiday EU plans rollout of Covid travel form by summer British Airways plans app-based travel pass Europe in vaccine race to save summer Key to the digital certificate is a QR code - a machine-readable graphic code made up of black and white squares - that contains personal data and the EU's Commission says it will be safe and secure. It is working with the World Health Organization to ensure the certificate is recognized beyond Europe. How will Denmark's vaccine passport work? Denmark plans to use its "Coronapas" vaccine passport domestically from Easter - but it could also be used later as a tool for international travel. Like a number of European countries, Denmark already has a secure digital ID system called NemID, and the Coronapas will be linked to that. NemID gives Danes access to various online platforms, including a digital listing of an individual's health records and test results. The pass will play a key role in easing Danish Covid restrictions - most of which are expected to end by 21 May, once all the high-risk groups and over-50s are fully vaccinated. Danes will have to show proof of vaccination, proof of earlier infection or a recent negative test to access services such as hairdressers, restaurants and cinemas. Sweden has been considering similar plans. Israel already has a vaccine passport system - how does that work? Israel has the highest vaccination rate in the world. More than half the population have already received two vaccine doses. Last month it was able to begin easing a nationwide lockdown. A "Green Pass" is available to anyone who has been fully vaccinated or has recovered from Covid-19. They have to show it to access facilities such as hotels, gyms or theatres. It is available as a paper certificate or in an app, which links users to their personal health ministry data. The app is opening up opportunities for international travel. Israel has struck deals with Greece and Cyprus so Israeli citizens with passes can travel to those two countries. However, several issues have been reported with the system since it was rolled out. Foreign nationals cannot get hold of the pass, nor can vaccinated citizens who are not insured with an Israeli healthcare provider. Experts have expressed privacy concerns over the smartphone app, and the government has admitted the police do not have the staff to check if businesses are complying with the new rules. What are the challenges? Within weeks of the World Health Organization confirming that the coronavirus was a global pandemic, dozens of companies were rushing to announce plans to offer digital health certificates or, later, vaccine passports. But many seemed ignorant of the huge regulatory, ethical and technical challenges involved. For any such certificate or passport to work, it is going to need two things - access to a country's official records of vaccinations and a secure method of identifying an individual and linking them to their health record. And if such a digital certificate is to be accepted by the border force of another country, it will probably have to adhere to common standards set by organizations such as the WHO or the EU. There are also all sorts of privacy and human rights issues - how confident will users be that their extremely sensitive health data will be stored securely and not put to other uses by an app developer or their government? And will the very existence of vaccine passports mean those who choose not to have one will have their freedom curtailed? This may be a particularly hard sell in the UK where, unlike in many countries, there's long been opposition to the idea of carrying a national identity card. How will Estonia's QR code passes work? Estonia, one of the world's most advanced digital societies, is planning to start issuing digital certificates in the form of a QR code, showing proof of vaccination by the end of April. Individuals will be able to download their own unique code to prove they have been vaccinated and showing how many doses they have received. They can either print it off or store it on a smartphone. "Launching our national solution early gives us the possibility to address potential obstacles in the use of the certificate," said Kalle Killar from the social affairs ministry. Having the system in place also meant Estonia was ready to join the EU's certificate from day one, he added. Is the UK planning to introduce vaccine passports? Although foreign holidays are not currently allowed, the role vaccine passports could play in travel is being discussed. "If another country says you can't come in unless you have the jab, then we want Brits to be able to demonstrate that," Health Secretary Matt Hancock has said. Domestically, Prime Minister Boris Johnson has told MPs that people visiting pubs and other venues could be asked to provide a vaccine certificate before entering. He told MPs he was "thinking very deeply" about the matter, and said that it "may be down to individual publicans". A government source has told the BBC the option of allowing people to show a negative test is also being looked at. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56522408 ---------- wrbtrader
As I stated last year, most likely the Swedish Health Officials and/or Sweden's Prime Minister will eventually need to answer questions about Sweden's Pandemic Strategy (a.k.a. Natural Herd Immunity) that these individuals (including Tegnell) have recently been denying was the foundation of their "Lockdown Lite" policy. ---------- Prime Minister Stefan Löfven to be questioned over Sweden’s coronavirus strategy Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven will be questioned this month by the Swedish parliament’s Committee on the Constitution over the action he took to handle the coronavirus pandemic. The date for his hearing has now been set to April 26th. It comes as part of an inquiry launched by an opposition politician to investigate the Swedish pandemic strategy and crisis management, and several key figures have already been questioned, among others the heads of the Public Health Agency, National Board of Health and Welfare, and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Health Minister Lena Hallengren is set to appear before the committee on Friday, followed by Home Affairs Minister Mikael Damberg on Monday next week. Swedish vocabulary: Committee on the Constitution – konstitutionsutskottet (KU) ---------- wrbtrader
Ontario just iasued a new stay at home order, insanity. Spanish mask law was just changed, ok to rwmove them in beaches, pools, places in nature as long as social distancing. Also OK when doing individual outdoor physical activity, sports but also work or dancing etc... In Madrid we re not even allowed to have guests at home in daytime, obviously lots of people don t care, less and less seem to follow the rulea actually, and I haven t heard of any enforcement of that law, but I also hear of night parties, at least small ones, literally all over down town apartments, not even hidden, people hanhing out at night drinking at their window. I don t go out much at night but there must be a reason Madrid has become a party magnet for europeans in those heavily restricted times. Local elections cominh up in May, hopefully the right stays in power. Other provinces in Spain are much stricter.
The Belgian State has been ordered to lift “all coronavirus measures” within 30 days, as the legal basis for them is insufficient, a Brussels court ruled on Wednesday. https://www.brusselstimes.com/bruss...titutions-high-risk-vaccination-reserve-list/ And so the walls hopefully start to crumble, but they've pumped enough BS Vaccines into every over 50 there life span will be on average massively reduced, the over 30s aren't far behind and the under 30's different vaccine, 1 that no doubt will lower the fertility, this is 99.99998% population control. See US also using ModeRNA for it's under 30's, odd that, all playing off the same script aren't they When people say it's really bad, remind them Belgium court of law thinks it's a NOTHING, just like we do. Lefties in power = great short term which is all anyone cares about, free money for all, then mass bankruptcy, no money, no health care, no jobs and basically screwed, not that anyone is allowed to think ahead ofcourse.
Iceland is one of the Nordic countries not discussed that much but they are one of the model countries in their Covid performance. In fact, Iceland had an entry BAN against Sweden back on February 24th 2021...going to and from Sweden. https://www.swedenabroad.se/en/abou...-to-sweden/temporary-ban-on-travel-to-sweden/ Today, Iceland is allowing travel into Iceland for travelers that are vaccinated because they want to protect their citizens and protect their economy. ---------- COVID-19 Vaccinated Third-Country Citizens Can Now Enter Iceland April 8, 2021 Travellers from countries outside the Schengen Zone, including those from the United Kingdom and the United States, can now enter Iceland, as the government has opened its doors for them since April 6. However, they will be obliged to follow certain conditions. According to Iceland’s authorities announcement, all persons outside the Schengen Zone and those in the UK and the US can enter Iceland if they show a vaccination certificate or proof that they had been previously infected with the virus but have recovered since then, SchengenVisaInfo.com reports. The decision was planned to take effect on March 26. Still, it was postponed until April 6, as according to the country’s authorities, more time is needed to permit scope for careful review of the procedures for estimating and accepting documentation. But Iceland will not be a transit point for foreign travellers, the country’s authorities have announced. Iceland’s flag carrier airline Icelandair has warned all travellers from the United States that they will not be permitted to fly with the airline to other European countries from Iceland, even though the latter is a member of the borderless area of Schengen. “Iceland is welcoming vaccinated visitors from outside the Schengen zone, but further travel from Iceland to the rest of Europe is currently not permitted for non-Schengen residents,” Icelandair’s website has clarified through an announcement. Amid the ongoing Coronavirus outbreak, Europe remains almost closed to all Americans; therefore, passengers who wish to enter Iceland to visit other countries in Europe will not be permitted to do so. Earlier this month, Iceland’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Health changed some rules for entering the territory regarding testing and quarantine requirements. The country’s government previously announced that it removed Spain from its list of countries profoundly affected by the virus after taking into account that the latter registered fewer cases of COVID-19 infections. Persons who wish to enter Iceland from territories where a 14-day Coronavirus case notification rate surpasses 500 per 100,000 are required to stay in a government quarantine facility or undergo isolation due to the virus. Such a measure is applied to all zones considered by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control as high-risk zones. This includes the red, dark, and grey categories of countries. The Coronavirus pandemic pushed Iceland’s government to temporarily freeze its plans of permitting nationals who have taken the vaccine against the virus to enter their territory. Since the beginning of the pandemic, Iceland has managed to maintain the Coronavirus situation under control. Up to this point, the country reported 6,251 cases of COVID-19 infection and 29 deaths. These figures, provided by Worldometrs, show that Iceland currently is among European countries with meagre infection rates. Iceland is the 158th most-affected country worldwide by the Coronavirus. https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/ne...third-country-citizens-can-now-enter-iceland/ ---------- wrbtrader
Boris said Pubs won't need Vaccine Passports from Stage 2 or 3 so stage 4 yes indeedy, so obviously they've preplanned all there staged, they tried but too much push back, instead there doing it to clothes shops, thankfully they all went bankrupt last year so not a huge issue. See WRB is posting Bullshit Propaganda from the BS Propaganda Brigade and posting as proof he's right and doesn't realise it's BS Propaganda to put the Great Reset on us, lefties. It's not about carrying identity card, we mostly have driving licenses and debit cards, it's about FORCING a unknown, barely tested vaccine on all of us for obviously bad reasons why else put vaccines into kids that aren't at risk at all, just SICK have we not done enough damage to Kids, not that anyone cares about kids!!
Culture How Sweden and Denmark Handled the COVID-19 Pandemic Differently It’s been almost a year since Denmark, Norway, and Finland locked down for the first time to curb the spread of COVID-19. Sweden chose a wholly different approach, opting out of shutting down schools and offices, mandatory uses of face-masks and closing down restaurants and bars. Now, as vaccines are being rolled out across the world, we are finally seeing the light at the end of the pandemic tunnel. As we approach a time when we’ll be able to hug again, it’s time we ask how and why Sweden chose such a different path, and what the effects have been on its population, healthcare workers and society at-large. In many ways, the Nordic countries are well-equipped to deal with external stressors such as a global pandemic. We have historically strong democracies with high levels of political participation and well-functioning welfare systems. Compared to other countries, gender-equality is high (although by no means perfect), and unemployment is low. Because higher education is tuition-free, the thresholds to enter universities are lower than in countries where getting an education might be dependent on your family’s wealth, or put you in life-long debt. Healthcare is available to everyone and is either free, or heavily subsidised by the state. Perhaps most important to pandemic regulations, Nordic citizens listen to what the government says. Yet in spite of these similarities, when the coronavirus hit, there was one country that chose a wildly different path than the rest of the Nordic countries: Sweden. At the time of writing this article, more than 12,500 people have died from the virus in Sweden, compared to Denmark’s 2,300 and Norway’s 607. Since many countries measure death rates differently, comparing numbers is a tricky business that should be done cautiously. But the fact remains that Sweden’s numbers raise some justified eyebrows. Sweden’s (in)famous strategy has made the headlines of most major global news publications and the world has been scratching their heads trying to understand why Sweden opted for such a different path than its neighbors. Looking at the way Sweden is governed in comparison to the other Nordic countries, this dissimilarity starts to make more sense. Let’s use Denmark as an example. Although both countries are currently governed by the Social Democratic Party, fronted by Mette Frederiksen in Denmark and Stefan Löfven in Sweden, the two countries have different ways of governing. The difference can partly be traced back to the role of public ministries. In Sweden, ministries are run independently and if a minister decides to actively govern the agencies, they would be accused of “ministerstyre,” which literally translates to “ministerial governance.” In fact, in Sweden “ministerstyre” is illegal and could lead to trial before The Committee on the Constitution. In Denmark the same word simply describes how the country’s ministries are governed, namely by the government’s ministers. In contrast to Sweden, Danish ministers wield far-reaching power and can direct the ministries at-will. In terms of the pandemic, this means that in Sweden, ministers have not been able to control the details of what their departments are doing. Led by the now world-famous state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, Sweden’s measures have thus been largely based on what the Public Health Agency sees as being in the public’s best interest. In Denmark on the other hand, Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and the Minister of Health and Elderly Affairs Magnus Heunicke have been shouldering the burden of steering Denmark through the pandemic, rather than their ministries. In theory, not allowing ministerial governance ensures that specific decisions affecting society are made by experts within their field, and not by politicians, who might (let’s face it) not always know what’s best. But in combination with a de-regulated market for health and elderly care, the lack of decisive political governance in Sweden has resulted in a power vacuum, where attribution of responsibility is being bounced around like a virtual hot potato between the government, the Public Health Authorities, the regions (who are in charge of the provision of health care), and the municipalities (who are in charge of the elderly care). The conditions for the elderly population in Sweden has attracted global attention in particular. More than 12,500 people have died from COVID-19 in Sweden, and at one point in time, Sweden’s per capita death rate was the highest in Europe. In Sweden, many of the private companies running the elderly care facilities have been accused of not paying their staff properly, having too many employees on hourly contracts (which means there’s a lot of people coming and going), and not providing their employees with adequate protective gear. Controversies have also arisen as decisions about providing palliative care have been made without elderly patients ever seeing a doctor. In Denmark on the other hand, the death toll is lower, but the government has also faced harsh criticism for over-reaching. It’s difficult to forget the millions of minks that were put to death, a decision that now has been deemed illegal. Face masks or not? Closing schools or not? Rules and regulations, or relying on people following unenforced recommendations? In Sweden, the opinion of Anders Tegnell has consistently been to not recommend rolling out rules that are not based on conclusive scientific evidence. For example, the effectiveness of using face masks has been contested, and only the future will tell the effects on the economy of locking down whole countries. Studies have already shown how women have lost out economically, professionally, and socially in a situation where children are kept at home. But all the while politicians, epidemiologists, and armchair-experts on Twitter have been big mouthing the effects of this or that measure, the people working at the frontline, caring for the sick and the elderly, have been carrying the weight of the pandemic on their shoulders. And in the EU, 76% of care workers are women. How did healthcare workers in both Denmark and Sweden experience these policy differences in real time? Julie Valentin Schepelern works as a nurse at Rigshospitalet’s infection clinic in Copenhagen. Moa Zickermann is a nurse at Astrid Lindgren’s Children’s Hospital in Stockholm. Both started working in 2020, facing coronavirus directly upon graduating. Although the clinics at which they work do not work with coronavirus cases only, they are meeting the pandemic on the frontline every day. They are absorbing the shock waves that COVID-19 is sending throughout the whole health care system. Reallocation of resources, lack of clear instructions, and worry about not being able to provide patients the treatment they need has become part of their daily lives. We spoke with Swedish nurse Moa and Danish nurse Julie about how Sweden and Denmark’s varied approaches to coronavirus continues to shape their work: Julie Valentin Schepelern Danish nurse at Rigshospitaliet Moa Zickerman Swedish nurse at Astrid Lindgren’s Children’s Hospital Why did you decide to become a nurse? Julie I didn’t think that I would become a nurse actually! My mom was a nurse, but I always thought that it wasn’t for me. She used to work with gastrointestinal patients. So she was involved with these surgeries where you go in through the mouth and down to the stomach to video tape the insides; I always though it was disgusting. So I just put the idea of becoming a nurse out of my head. Then at some point I just pulled to it. I didn’t like the idea of sitting in an office and I really wanted to help take care of others. I think I’m a pretty caring person, so it ended up feeling natural for me to go into that direction. Two weeks after I graduated from nursing school this summer, I started working at the infectious disease clinic at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen. We deal with all sorts of infections, including coronavirus, but also sexually transmitted infections like HIV, infections in the back, brain abscesses, and tropical diseases. Moa I just wanted to work with people and do something that matters. Nursing felt like a good choice. During my education, I of course had my ups and downs. Sometimes I really felt like, “fuck, is this really what I want to do?” Not all areas of nursing were equally as interesting or fun to learn about, while I was super excited to learn about others. My plan is to continue my education to become a midwife, but to do that I first need some work experience. I wanted to work with something that is related to that field, which is how I ended up at the children’s hospital. Now that I’ve started working, I love my job. Working with children is so much fun! They’re really amazing; they’re funny and so patient, you wouldn’t believe it. Many of them are very ill when they come to us, but they power through all the tests and examinations we have to do. And the people I work with are also incredible. We’re a group of young women, many of us are recent graduates, and we’ve become good friends. I’ve never enjoyed working this much at any other job. What has it been like working with COVID-19? Julie When coronavirus first came to Denmark and the hospitals were completely overflowing, I wasn’t working yet. But I heard from my colleagues that both of the floors that are part of of the infection clinic were filled with coronavirus patients. I think this was because people assumed that us infection nurses, and people working at our clinic, would know how to deal with it, you know? COVID-19 is an infection, so let’s send them to the infection clinic! The truth is, when coronavirus first came, no one knew how to deal with it. So no one knew exactly what protection to wear, or how to interact with the patients in a safe way. Everyone thought: “okay, they’ve got this.” Then when we were hit by the second wave. They shut down one of our floors and took all the staff to work specifically with coronavirus patients. This obviously meant that there were less nurses working with our other patients. A couple of weeks ago, they re-opened the floor again, staffed it with other nurses and started taking in additional coronavirus patients again. But now, luckily it’s been shut down again because there aren’t enough cases. I think this re-allocation of staff back and forth has been quite challenging, especially because it takes a lot of energy to deal with coronavirus patients. When they’re really sick, they need a lot of care, and you need to have a lot of energy and focus. We’re used to having a few complicated or complex cases at the time. Around Christmas, out of 14 hospital beds, half of them were complex cases. We just didn’t have the staff to properly deal with that. Downsizing from two floors to one just really increased the work burden on all of us who were left to treat the patients on our floor. This situation really sucks, and it has sometimes made me feel like I’m letting the patients down. We just can’t keep up, because we’re so understaffed. I love my job when I can actually spend some time with the patients. When you are hospitalised at the infection clinic, you are only allowed one visitor, and if you have coronavirus, you are not even allowed one. So I think the patients start feeling lonely quite easily. I can also imagine it’s been quite confusing for the patients, because the staff have been quite confused about the rules and regulations that change all the time. One day it’s okay to do this thing but not that thing, and then the next it’s the other way around. And then we just have to say, “sorry, new restrictions again, the thing I told you was okay last night is apparently no longer okay now.” Even though there’s been so many articles about nurses being stressed out dealing with the coronavirus, I think at least at my clinic, we’re doing a really good job. We’re keeping our heads high, we’re trying to maintain light mood and stay positive. Sometimes it’s not possible; we for sure have very bad days. But I still really like my job. Moa I wasn’t that worried about it when I started working this summer. It was a bit of a limbo between the spring and whatever was coming next; people were still questioning if a second wave was coming. So I got to start gently. Of course it took time getting used to all the protective gear with both masks and visors, and many of us have gotten wounds and headaches from them. I’m constantly out of breath because I’m always breathing in my own expelled air. But you get used to that as well. It’s just become part of my job and my uniform. What’s happened as the second wave rolled in is that we had to send personnel to other departments, which affected our work a lot. Everyone had to take extra shifts, we were completely over-run and had way too many patients for the amount of staff. For about three weeks, every day was more or less chaos: everyone was overworked, we didn’t have any time, and everyone was feeling terrible. Now things have started to improve. What worries me is the uptick of patients with something called MIS-C, or Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, which has been linked to coronavirus. The kids who come to the clinic with this syndrome are very, very ill. It’s been said for a long time that kids aren’t that affected by coronavirus, and it’s true that the infection itself is usually quite mild. But then a couple of weeks later they come to us with high fever and rashes, and their whole bodies are swollen and aching. When we run tests we can see that their organs are attacking themselves and start to fail. This spring, we didn’t even know about this long term effect of the virus, but thankfully we do now. When we get patients like this, we now know what to look for, so we test them for anti-bodies. We’re also very good at treating MIS-C, so in Sweden, I think all children have recovered. I don’t know what the situation is like in the rest of the world. If these children don’t get the treatment they need, they can die. It’s that bad. Facing these children and their parents can be challenging. Not a lot of people know about what MIS-C is because it hasn’t been talked about a lot. So of course people worry and get confused. And when it comes to the kids, they just want their parents close, and instead they are faced with a bunch of strangers wearing full protective gear who want to run tests on them. I was treating this little guy; for the first couple of days, all he did was scream. He couldn’t sleep, everything was hurting, and he had a constant high fever. Then after the treatment kicked in, I saw him walking around in the corridor, he was smiling and he was so happy, and I just felt like, “Wow! You screamed at me for a whole week, and now you’re happy! What a difference!” Nothing beats that feeling. What would make your job as a nurse easier right now? Julie One of the biggest topics right now is that nurses should get paid better, and we absolutely should. The nurses who have signed up to deal exclusively with coronavirus have received a bit of extra money, but this is not something we’re getting at the infection clinic, even though we also deal with coronavirus patients. I guess that’s because the government think that if you’ve chosen to work at the infection clinic, there’s always the chance you’ll get infected by something, so dealing with coronavirus is not something out of the ordinary. We picked this job, so we don’t get that pay boost. Money is not why I chose this job. If I wanted a high salary, I would have done something else. Instead, I’d say that what would help us as nurse is to have more staff. If there were more nurses, we would have time not only to treat people, but also to care for them. I wanted to become a nurse to give people care, but now I feel like I don’t have time for that at all. Moa Generally speaking, we are under-staffed. We have to get people in from staffing agencies, which is not always the best solution. We’ve just started a section specifically for kids with MIS-C, so hopefully that will make it easier for the patients and for us nurses. Having a stable staff situation would be great, but I think lack of personnel is not necessarily a COVID-only problem. Having to send staff to other clinics has definitely not helped our situation. Sweden and Denmark chose different ways of navigating the pandemic, but the stories coming from healthcare workers and nurses are remarkably similar. No doubt there will be countless studies, reports, and commissions working to figure out which measures were effective, which were superfluous, and most importantly; what to do when the next pandemic hits. The frontline needs to be better staffed, and the people working to fight the virus need more stable working conditions and a significant pay raise. As a society, we need to rise to the occasion and support those who are supporting us. Find out about the differences in how Sweden and Denmark approached the #MeToo movement...... ---------- To become educated about Covid in the Scandinavian countries...you can read the remainder of the above article @ https://www.scandinaviastandard.com...rk-handled-the-covid-19-pandemic-differently/ wrbtrader