Because Trumps cohorts advised him to as they figured there was a better chance killing him quickly rather than using bleach.
It wouldn't be possible to answer this question seriously because it is not a serious question. It is based on obvious bias and not fact. Please find me any video of his press conferences, which he did very frequently at that time to reassure the public through the early days of the covid pandemic, where he said to drink bleach. This was a stupid hoax put out by the Democrat smear campaign to the media, it is repeated by those who are fixated on hating Trump and repeating what has been disproven and known to be a smear or hoax on the unwitting or those plagued with Trump Derangement Syndrome. Are you one of those? I thought better of your mental prowess prior to hearing you say this.. Don't disappoint me now please. More than likely, he was refering to hypochlorous acid when he said "DISINFECTANT". He never said bleach, he is not a stupid man, and it troubles me that you would believe in a very publicized smear when all one has to do is pull up the video and know it was a lie told by the Dems because they believe the public, who keep voting them in while they cheat and lie, are as stupid as they believe they are. Next.. he took HCQ all along, as a prophylactic, I never heard about him taking Ivermectin or stocking up on it for public use as he did with HCQ, acquiring a significant amount to treat the more compromised public prophylacticaly, which was soon quashed by those vested interests who were already targeting the market with their mrna vaccines. Hypochlorous acid by the way, is another means of stopping any viral respiratory entrance into your system by using it as a nose spray and it is even safe to spray in your eyes. It kills bacteria that is harmful (within 1 minute, does not harm cells and promotes rapid healing) and is a known successful treatment for MRSA. We used it all through the covid period and I use it for treating wounds and a myriad of other issues with our pets. Now that we have knocked your earlier, perhaps naive, misrepresentations constituting your argument about the vaccines and Trump... let's get on to the statistics. I know of no other lay person's complete source for statistical analysis of the various reports coming in from all countries where there is sufficent research into the rollout and consequences of the vaccines during the earliest time to now than Dr. John Campbell. A bit about him, he was initially fully supportive of the vaccine rollout, but in time he became concerned about its consequeces and lack of research or hidden dangers that were suppressed by Pfizer et al. If you want analysis of various countries statistics as they rolled out and continue to, please consider seeing his You Tube channel. Other than that, I can not and will not find and collect for you all of the statistics and reports I've read over these past 3 years, but you can find sufficient data and references within John Campbell's work and his interviews and research analysis as I said earlier. https://www.youtube.com/@Campbellteaching/videos Next, you mentioned Ivermectin and lung cancer small cell type. Enough evidence based reports have come in to suggest and encourage the use of this drug along with other treatments where it has significatly helped people recover from what was stage 4. If you were on Twitter (now X) you would see many people who have tried it and/or their loved ones were put onto using it and the reports of it benefiting if not curing their cancer issues. I'm not an expert, but this is encouraging. I've also read that the drug needs to be taken at a dosage of at a minimum 60mg once or twice a day.. Not sure, but the dosage is high and taken intermittently over a period of months. You again, at the end of your post, throw out a misleading statement regarding Trump's efforts with the covid crisis. He had earlier created a bill that allowed for experimental drugs to be used with seriously ill patients without needing approval by the FDA first. This has saved many lives who earlier had no hope of novel treatment options. The FDA, under the influence of $ from big Pharma, had tried to persuade the public that Ivermectin was "horse dewormer". They have since retracted this outrageous misrepresentation and now Ivermectin is available for public use where covid or other viral infections need early or prophylactic treatment. We keep several boxes of Ivermectin here in the house. One of our housemates is a Dr who is working on his Phd and he took it for the flu a few weeks ago when he started to come down with it, was over his bout of the flu within 30 hours, back on his feet and feeling fine. Our other housemate who came down with the flu also took it early on and was back to work in 2 days. Me, I got the flu, took Ivermectin early too, which stopped in a day the worst of the symptoms but it took a bit longer for me to get over it, however, the worst was gone in 24 hours. Don't tell me it doesn't work.
Then you should find the information on this research regarding Ivermectin and cancer treatment very interesting:
what makes you think he got vaccinated? bc he told you? I am telling you I can fly like superman. Now you know it to be true. you just fall off the turnip truck like an illegal?
Guys, Thanks for all your responses and counter arguments. Nothing pleases me more if you guys are correct and I am wrong, because that means I learn something new. There is really no shame for been wrong. I will study all your responses carefully, may still disagree or find them not scientifically correct but that is OK, we need a good discussion and not name calling. So if you are cured from lung cancer using ivermectin, I am happy for you. Same if you are cured from COVID by taking ivermectin, that is great. I greatly appreciate if you can share those experience with us. I am fundamentally a student of science. What I like about science is eventually the cream (truth) will rise to the top. Many mainstream accepted science were once considered crazy. Dr Allison's CTLA and Dr Kariko's RNA were two recent examples. In physics, black holes and gravitational waves were both at one time been questioned as artifacts of mathematics and not real. Since this is a trading website, the same comment on science can be said about trading. If you can consistently make money with a scheme, great. I have my own example. Most experts on ET said buying options is a loser's game yet for over a decade, I made a good living buying options. I am a statistic of one or fooled by randomness? Have a good day.
Thanks. Maybe you can help me with more searches. So far I have not found exactly what I am looking for: 1. A statistical study, with a statistically significant sample (population) size. 2. With a better than 95% confidence level conclusions. 3. Comparing apple to apple to a null hypothesis and is significantly better than the null hypothesis. Either HCQ or ivermectin, for cancer or for COVID. Thanks.
Ivermectin and COVID: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2801827 February 20, 2023 Effect of Higher-Dose Ivermectin for 6 Days vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With COVID-19A Randomized Clinical Trial Ivermectin and cancer (clinical trial in progress): https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05318469 Ivermectin and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
On this particular thread and only on this particular thread, as I type any word related to the china bug or the related shot..my google chrome drops my data connection, or the chrome browser suddenly closes..repeatedly many times. Its almost identical to what happens on Youtube when I am doing a livestream and the same topic is mentioned..but with Youtube its a warning sent to my Youtube account..But I have seen YT Livestreams ended by Youtube suddenly during this topic
@ph1l That study you posted has more holes in it than Duncan donuts It was flawed and a lot of researchers on Twitter have given their reasons, and I've read them ages ago. Good studies as well as this one are discussed by Dr. John Campbell. Dr. Campbell has a whole video on the lack of integrity and those who were responible for this (well publicized) study.. (in propaganda and fda chicanery) you posted above. You may not want to belive it, but Ivermectin works, not only for parasites but against inflamtion, viruses and bacteria, and there are the reports of it working to help against cancer.